ICE Attorney resigns in protest

  • Thread starter Thread starter JDs Couch
  • Start date Start date
Laputan Machine said:
In United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the search and seizure by United States agents of property that is owned by a nonresident alien and located in a foreign country.

In reaching its decision, the majority examined the FourthAmendment phrase “the people.” It concluded that the term referred to“a class of persons who are part of a national community or have otherwisedeveloped sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of thatcommunity.” In contrast, those who have not established a sufficientconnection to this country are not one of “the people,” and,therefore, not protected under the Fourth Amendment.
Click to expand...
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, applies to non-citizens in the United States, though the extent of that protection can be nuanced. Generally, non-citizens with "substantial voluntary connections" to the United States are afforded Fourth Amendment protections. This means that even those who are not U.S. citizens, whether lawfully present or not, are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by government officials.
 
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, any person with “substantial voluntary connections” to the United States is protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, and the government needs a warrant based on probable cause before conducting a search or seizure. Non-U.S. persons entering the United States, legally or illegally, may or may not have such connections. Non-citizens who are lawfully or unlawfully present in the United States, other than those present on a valid 90-day tourist visa, are deemed more likely to have these connections.
 
JDs Couch said:
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, any person with “substantial voluntary connections” to the United States is protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, and the government needs a warrant based on probable cause before conducting a search or seizure. Non-U.S. persons entering the United States, legally or illegally, may or may not have such connections. Non-citizens who are lawfully or unlawfully present in the United States, other than those present on a valid 90-day tourist visa, are deemed more likely to have these connections.
Click to expand...
Provide the court ruling that supports your position, and no, chatGPT doesn't count bro.
 
bafkreifxj4bkyzany3via2vopkqzhzgh654s3vjwzcpxtxpvjfszwnwpn4.jpg
 
These assholes are just pissed that Trump made canada his bitch in front of the whole world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top