D
Dyllheaven88
Well-known member
What’s the major differences ?
800s have less gain but have a better overall tone IMO esp when turned up. Simpler circuit, 2203/4 are single channel while 2205/10 have FX loops and a barely passable clean channel. The single channels need a boost pedal to get medium-high gain, 2205/10 (best ones from 87-90) have enough for 80s stuff without a boost. 800s also include NMV versions (the 1959/1987) but those are pretty rare. The 25th anniversary Jubilee series have a better clean channel and more gain, are darker and smoother and highly sought after. Made during the 800 series.Dyllheaven88":21vh3fdn said:What’s the major differences ?
Racerxrated":j97b4ltq said:800s have less gain but have a better overall tone IMO esp when turned up. Simpler circuit, 2203/4 are single channel while 2205/10 have FX loops and a barely passable clean channel. The single channels need a boost pedal to get medium-high gain, 2205/10 (best ones from 87-90) have enough for 80s stuff without a boost. 800s also include NMV versions (the 1959/1987) but those are pretty rare. The 25th anniversary Jubilee series have a better clean channel and more gain, are darker and smoother and highly sought after. Made during the 800 series.Dyllheaven88":j97b4ltq said:What’s the major differences ?
900s have a thinner tone but all the gain you need; when turned up they fill out better but fall short to any 800 IMO. They have more features like FX loops and better clean channels. There are a few different 900 models which include the SLX (the fire breather of the 900s) and the 6100(30th anniversary series) which many like even over 800s. If I were to buy one I'd look for the 6100 as they do sound better at a lower volume than other 900s IMO.
Most will gravitate towards 800s and feel the transformers were better...leading to better tone overall than 900s. But I've heard some 900s sound damn good but like most Marshalls have to be turned up.
Also, I've heard some horror stories about the 900 circuit having failures and hard to fix because of the complexity while 800s are less prone to failure while being easier to work on because of the simplicity.
Dyllheaven88":3vjgbiod said:I’ve found a 50 watt mkiii 900 and a nice looking 800 about 400$ price difference trying to decide which one would be better ! Mostly play heavy metal to hard rock .
I have a 72 Super Tremolo, and it is an absolute beast..I run an SD1 and OD1X into the front end and it's 80s HR/Metal..turn the boosts off and its a decent clean. But no loop, and extreme high gain is hard to get. The 800 NMV will be similar and give you a crushing clear 80s metal tone with a boost or two but will need a mod for a loop..easy enough for a tech to do. The 800 at volume with the right boost pedals will destroy any 900 for pure clear crushing gain.Dyllheaven88":26fwd2k4 said:Single channel nmv 800 and a mkiii jcm 900
Racerxrated":15dzh037 said:800s have less gain but have a better overall tone IMO esp when turned up. Simpler circuit, 2203/4 are single channel while 2205/10 have FX loops and a barely passable clean channel. The single channels need a boost pedal to get medium-high gain, 2205/10 (best ones from 87-90) have enough for 80s stuff without a boost. 800s also include NMV versions (the 1959/1987) but those are pretty rare. The 25th anniversary Jubilee series have a better clean channel and more gain, are darker and smoother and highly sought after. Made during the 800 series.Dyllheaven88":15dzh037 said:What’s the major differences ?
900s have a thinner tone but all the gain you need; when turned up they fill out better but fall short to any 800 IMO. They have more features like FX loops and better clean channels. There are a few different 900 models which include the SLX (the fire breather of the 900s) and the 6100(30th anniversary series) which many like even over 800s. If I were to buy one I'd look for the 6100 as they do sound better at a lower volume than other 900s IMO.
Most will gravitate towards 800s and feel the transformers were better...leading to better tone overall than 900s. But I've heard some 900s sound damn good but like most Marshalls have to be turned up.
Also, I've heard some horror stories about the 900 circuit having failures and hard to fix because of the complexity while 800s are less prone to failure while being easier to work on because of the simplicity.