LOG's Mesa Mark IV tone is absolutely garbage....

[Dimebag11]

....there I said it

I love the Mesa Mark tone, but they make it sound like twangy ass....I knowm....it's blasphemous.

Everytime I get a craving to get a Mesa Mark IV/V I just put in some LOG and say FUCK THAT

 

[JakeAC5253]

I actually agree. Their riffing is top notch, but whoever they are getting to record their material is terrible. Whoever the engineer is he makes a Mesa Tube halfstack sound like a Rockman...

 

[Dimebag11]

Good, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this

I do love LOG though, completely badass band. Although, tbh even their live Mark IV tone sounds kinda crappy.

 

[blackba]

....there I said it

I love the Mesa Mark tone, but they make it sound like twangy ass....I knowm....it's blasphemous.

Everytime I get a craving to get a Mesa Mark IV/V I just put in some LOG and say FUCK THAT

I think you would like a mark III better than a IV or V anyway.

I have heard of LOG, but never listened to them. Will have to check out a few songs to how good or bad their guitar tone is. Big Mark IV fan myself, not really a metalhead though compared to most on this forum anyway.

 

[Shark Diver]

What does LOG stand for?

 

[Dimebag11]

Lamb of God.....I've owned a III I liked it, never owned a IV or V.

 

[155]

I fuckin love that tone! pure unsaturated balls to the wall alot of players would be scared to play with such little distortion, kick ass to me...and their riffs are amazing

 

[Shark Diver]

Lamb of God.....I've owned a III I liked it, never owned a IV or V.

I should have known that. Brain fart.

 

[Shiny_Surface]

Lamb of God.....I've owned a III I liked it, never owned a IV or V.

You should probably avoid the Mark series, lol.

 

[DEWD]

Their tone is way better now then their earlier stuff. I think it's okay but it does have that too much mids/honky Mark series sound. They need to pull that 750 slider down a tad.

 

[travis bickle]

they have always suffered from bad tone, recorded or live. great riffing though.

 

[droptrd]

I like the LOG tones. Very crunchy. I think its more to do with the hot ceramic pups they use. But anyway, i find unique and much more interesting sounding than the typical generic petrucci mark iv tone

 

[Atropos_Project]

I fuckin love that tone! pure unsaturated balls to the wall alot of players would be scared to play with such little distortion, kick ass to me...and their riffs are amazing

There's actually a healthy amount of gain being used. Their tone is by no means my favorite, but a better bass guitar sound would help balance out what they're doing a lot.

 

[Anonymous]

I fuckin love that tone! pure unsaturated balls to the wall alot of players would be scared to play with such little distortion, kick ass to me...and their riffs are amazing

I agree. Not typical MKIV tone, but I like the guitar sounds on their albums...

Steve

 

[glassjaw7]

I like it. The two guitar sounds mix very well. One is scooped and one has the 750 slider up a little more. Great metal tones compared to a lot of other guys IMO.

 

[Dimebag11]

I like it. The two guitar sounds mix very well. One is scooped and one has the 750 slider up a little more. Great metal tones compared to a lot of other guys IMO.

I don't agree with that, but different strokes I guess.....I think their tone is one of the worst modern metal tones ever.

 

[Random Hero]

From a guy with "Dimebag" in his username?










FWIW, I don't like em either.

 

[thiswaythatway]

I don't like anything about LOG. I think they suck IMHO.

 

[zee1usa]

I don't like anything about LOG. I think they suck IMHO.

Well just stick with your Nickleback then..

 

[thiswaythatway]

I don't like anything about LOG. I think they suck IMHO.

Well just stick with your Nickleback then..

I don't listen to Nickleback. Swing and a miss.