Lonestar or Mark V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amiller
  • Start date Start date

Lonestar or Mark V

  • Lonestar

    Votes: 6 20.7%
  • Mark V

    Votes: 23 79.3%

  • Total voters
    29
amiller

amiller

New member
I really like the tone Andy Timmons is getting from his Lonestar. So much so, I've been really GASing for one.

BUT...

If I'm going to get a new MESA...what about a Mark V? :lol: :LOL:

I'm guessing most of you guys will pick the Mark V 'cause it's the latest greatest. :lol: :LOL:

So, what do ya think?
 
The Mark V is more interesting for me than the Lonestar.
I've tried the Lonestar and was only midly interested.
But if you like Andy Timmons tone, the Lonestar is a good choice.
 
These are totally different amps. The V may give you cleans as good as the Lonestar but the Lonestar has a lead tone in it that the Mark V will never give you. The V can get heavier and probably has uber-gain. Depends on what you want. I never played a V but prefer the Lonestar to the Mark IV.
 
dfrattaroli":xyhvwrq1 said:
These are totally different amps. The V may give you cleans as good as the Lonestar but the Lonestar has a lead tone in it that the Mark V will never give you. The V can get heavier and probably has uber-gain. Depends on what you want. I never played a V but prefer the Lonestar to the Mark IV.

Yeah, I hear what your saying. I am leaning more toward the Lonestar but thought I'd get some views on the Mark V as well. I guess it's the excitement of a new Mark from MESA that has me curious.
 
If you are buying NEW Definitely the Mark V, however if you are going the used route, go for a Lonestar now and see if you like it, by then some MV's will probably pop up :D
 
cyndicate":30kh7aa9 said:
If you are buying NEW Definitely the Mark V, however if you are going the used route, go for a Lonestar now and see if you like it, by then some MV's will probably pop up :D

at least 3 to 5 from this forum alone. :lol: :LOL:
 
Not very familiar with either, I say Mark V, it just looks killer and from what I heard, sounds great, and probally will have a better resale value at first if you don't like it.
 
If your goal is Andy Timmons then go with the Lonestar and a BB Preamp.. However, you kind of need him to get HIS tone.. LOL!:D His rig is only 1/2 the battle.
 
Vrad":2k6rz67x said:
If your goal is Andy Timmons then go with the Lonestar and a BB Preamp.. However, you kind of need him to get HIS tone.. LOL!:D His rig is only 1/2 the battle.

:lol: :LOL: Well, I don't want to sound exactly like Timmons (like I ever could! :lol: :LOL: :doh: ) I dig the tone he gets and would like to just get into the ball park. :lol: :LOL:
 
I would have to think that with all the Eq options . it would be pretty easy to get the Lonestar clean and solo sounds from the first 2 channels .by working with it for a bit ..

from what I have been told from local dealer .
the clean channel is based on the MKIV and the Lonestar .
 
Oops, I went against the flow of the poll and pulled the trigger on a Lonestar. The Mark V is just too much of an unknown for me right now and I liked to see it around for a while to shake out the production bugs before I'd get one. Besides, I already have a Mark IV. I got a descent deal from fellow forumite Duolos - Terry, thanks so much. The amp should be here by Wednesday. :rock:

Thanks for the input...you guys rock! :rock:
 
Turn the bass almost all the way off on the drive channel.
Mesa LSC is one of the best amps ever made IMHO.
Not for Metal, but a very rich amp for grown ups.
:thumbsup:
 
buddaman71":23bh8f1y said:
Turn the bass almost all the way off on the drive channel.
Mesa LSC is one of the best amps ever made IMHO.
Not for Metal, but a very rich amp for grown ups.
:thumbsup:

Yeah, I saw the Andy Timmons video on the Mesa website and he basically said the same thing about turning the bass down. I think he has his set around 9:00. I'm pretty excited about getting this amp. :rock:
 
dfrattaroli":smrmd5wr said:
These are totally different amps. The V may give you cleans as good as the Lonestar but the Lonestar has a lead tone in it that the Mark V will never give you. The V can get heavier and probably has uber-gain. Depends on what you want. I never played a V but prefer the Lonestar to the Mark IV.
I dunno... nobody's heard the Mark I mode on the V yet, it just might get in that ballpark.
 
swimrunner":3q5vd8vo said:
dfrattaroli":3q5vd8vo said:
These are totally different amps. The V may give you cleans as good as the Lonestar but the Lonestar has a lead tone in it that the Mark V will never give you. The V can get heavier and probably has uber-gain. Depends on what you want. I never played a V but prefer the Lonestar to the Mark IV.
I dunno... nobody's heard the Mark I mode on the V yet, it just might get in that ballpark.

Hmmm...maybe, but we won't know that until the MK V has been around for awhile and the reviews start coming in.
 
You are going to be waiting a while if you want to see real reviews and not the new gear day boner reviews.
 
Duke309":1hmpe08k said:
You are going to be waiting a while if you want to see real reviews and not the new gear day boner reviews.

:lol: :LOL: :D

Yep, that's one of the reasons I went with the Lonestar.
 
His tone is still pretty bassy mesas are wierd amps to tweak coming from everything else.
 
Back
Top