steve_k":3lxon4tp said:
ratter":3lxon4tp said:
Seems like it should be a fairly easy choice - I don't see a lot of overlap there. Luxxtone does the vintage hot rod stylized thing with their unique finishes and metalwork. Suhr does the custom superstrat-to-Modern thing. Which one do you prefer? Tricked out '69 Nova or a '12 M3? That should answer the question.
ps - not to argue with anybody in particular, but ALL guitars are handmade.
Spot on with the first statement.
Dead wrong on the second part unless you are talking about programming the CNC machines!
I'd like to hear more about why you think I'm dead wrong. That's not a challenge but an honest request. And I'm not talking about the builders mentioned in this thread but just in general.
Here's where I'm coming from. I'm just a hack but I've built guitars with "ordinary" tools - pin router templates, spokeshave necks, etc. As well as with my own CNC machine that I program. The difference in the amount of handwork between the two is really only the neck carving part. And I'll gladly give up the spokeshave to know that with a CNC, once I have a neck carve I love, I can nail it each and every time. There is absolutely NO time savings in the time it takes me to build a neck, at least with my small CNC. It is actually a good bit slower and the learning curve is drastically steeper. Expense-wise, one is a few hundred bucks worth of tools while the other costs as much as a car. On top of all of that there are still hours of hand work left to be done after a neck comes off the CNC before it is ready for finish. And all that handwork is the important stuff - namely sanding and fretwork. It's a tradeoff in the name of consistency.
If you're using the term "handmade" to mean the opposite of CNC, what you're really talking about 99% of the time is pin routers and templates. And oftentimes those templates were purchased or hired out to other shops who CNC or laser'ed them for the builder! Where's the romance in that? I just don't get it. To me it shows a lack of understanding of the processes.
I think most people
who have done both would agree with me. I read once where a big-name builder said "the only guys who aren't using CNC are the ones who either can't afford it or can't figure it out." That's hyperbole but it probably applies more often than some would like to admit.
IMO it's all good. I find something to love in pretty much any guitar or amp. But sometimes I have to scratch my head at the perceptions.
Back to the topic at hand. If I'm not mistaken, Luxxtone necks are CNC made from a very high-quality source. From where I sit that should be a point of pride. Whether you're doing it yourself or somebody else is doing it, you are paying for it either in cost per neck (if you are hiring it out to a quality shop like USACG, Wildwood, etc.) or the cost for your own machinery and know-how. And Suhr...it seems like Suhr has grown to the size where people now lump him in with other large factories. I don't get that. The same could be said of PRS, I think. The size of the operation doesn't HAVE to mean that the process loses quality. It can mean that, obviously, but it doesn't have to. The proof is in the end product, IMO.
ps - by the same token, the people who bag on "parts" guitars show a lack of understanding of how much skill, specialized tooling, and effort it takes to finish a guitar and then make it play great. In a lot of ways, that's where the rubber meets the road because that's where you interface with the player/buyer. 9/10 buy with their eyes. If they get past the eyeball check, then it comes down to the feel and setup. None of that happens by magic. It requires effort (by hand), time, and expense.