
LesPaul1967
New member
I've been trying to figure this out for years and years...
Supposedly the 2203 and 2204 Master Volume amps have the same preamp section. I'm curious to why they sound so different from one another, in every case(in my experience, anyway) it seems the 50 is tighter and more aggressive, and the 100's are more bloated in the low end, less lively, with seemingly less gain and grind. All of them sound unique amp to amp, but every single stock 50 and 100 watt, head to head has this same result, even at low volumes. Maybe the Drake vs. Dagnall thing? Curious if anyone could explain this?
Supposedly the 2203 and 2204 Master Volume amps have the same preamp section. I'm curious to why they sound so different from one another, in every case(in my experience, anyway) it seems the 50 is tighter and more aggressive, and the 100's are more bloated in the low end, less lively, with seemingly less gain and grind. All of them sound unique amp to amp, but every single stock 50 and 100 watt, head to head has this same result, even at low volumes. Maybe the Drake vs. Dagnall thing? Curious if anyone could explain this?
