Marshall 1959 or 2203

  • Thread starter Thread starter messenger
  • Start date Start date

1959 or 2203

  • 1959

    Votes: 24 57.1%
  • 2203

    Votes: 18 42.9%

  • Total voters
    42
Greazygeo":2ipd7xy2 said:
Not really much difference between the two....find a good one of either one, mod the power supply alittle, run it on ten and you are good to go.

Why should he mod the power supply?

:)
 
peterc52":1s8pddue said:
Greazygeo":1s8pddue said:
Not really much difference between the two....find a good one of either one, mod the power supply alittle, run it on ten and you are good to go.

Why should he mod the power supply?

:)
So you can sound like VH. That's what everyone wants right? :)
 
Greazygeo":3gd8a94e said:
Not really much difference between the two....find a good one of either one, mod the power supply alittle, run it on ten and you are good to go.

You run higher filtering in yours? I think higher mains filtering works great in the older Marshalls, reduces the ghosting when it's cranked! :)
 
MrDan666":1mudycg3 said:
Greazygeo":1mudycg3 said:
Not really much difference between the two....find a good one of either one, mod the power supply alittle, run it on ten and you are good to go.

You run higher filtering in yours? I think higher mains filtering works great in the older Marshalls, reduces the ghosting when it's cranked! :)
Oh yeah. I see the guys running lower filtering and think :no:
 
Greazygeo":2wawmkvf said:
Oh yeah. I see the guys running lower filtering and think :no:

Yeah i think higher filtering atleast on the mains works best! :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top