
rlord1974
Active member
I have been GAS'ing for a Randall RT2/50, VHT 2/90/2, Mesa 2:90 or VHT 2/50/2 for some time now. I still am and regardless of the discussion to follow, I'm looking!
I currently have a Marshall 9200 2x100 watt power amp. 8 x 5881 power tubes. Although it sounds good, the real knock on it is it weighs 74 pounds! DAMN that hurts! Also, I really don't need a 200 watt power amp. I am a single 4x12" guy in all cases and like to stand 6 to 12 feet in front of my cabinet so I can really work the feedback of the amp when desired. Mostly large club shows and some open air festivals. Overall, a 50 watt power stage in total would probably suffice, but I think 100 watts is nice to have for the clean headroom.
OK, so here's the conundrum:
Given all of the issues friends and colleagues (and fellow forumites) have been experiencing with EL34's and even KT-88/6550's recently, why would I sell the Marshall to get an amp that runs on such tubes? The Marshall was designed to run on 5881's for the very reason that, at the time (i.e., the 90's), they were the most readily available and reliable power stage tube available. Oddly enough, 15 years later, they still are. Granted, maybe they don't have the "crunch" and midrange punch and harmonics of an EL34, but they sound great regardless and I have rarely ever had any tube issues.
Also, one other item: Anybody know if it's possible to safely run the 9200 with only 2 tubes per channel instead of the 4, in order to get the power down to just 50 watts per side?
Just looking for your thoughts. Peace!
[BTW: I realize the Mesa 2:90 runs on 6L6's, which is nice. However, it really is probably more power than I need, as already discussed. I mentioned it above because, well, if the right one came along I'd still be interested!]

I currently have a Marshall 9200 2x100 watt power amp. 8 x 5881 power tubes. Although it sounds good, the real knock on it is it weighs 74 pounds! DAMN that hurts! Also, I really don't need a 200 watt power amp. I am a single 4x12" guy in all cases and like to stand 6 to 12 feet in front of my cabinet so I can really work the feedback of the amp when desired. Mostly large club shows and some open air festivals. Overall, a 50 watt power stage in total would probably suffice, but I think 100 watts is nice to have for the clean headroom.
OK, so here's the conundrum:

Given all of the issues friends and colleagues (and fellow forumites) have been experiencing with EL34's and even KT-88/6550's recently, why would I sell the Marshall to get an amp that runs on such tubes? The Marshall was designed to run on 5881's for the very reason that, at the time (i.e., the 90's), they were the most readily available and reliable power stage tube available. Oddly enough, 15 years later, they still are. Granted, maybe they don't have the "crunch" and midrange punch and harmonics of an EL34, but they sound great regardless and I have rarely ever had any tube issues.
Also, one other item: Anybody know if it's possible to safely run the 9200 with only 2 tubes per channel instead of the 4, in order to get the power down to just 50 watts per side?
Just looking for your thoughts. Peace!

[BTW: I realize the Mesa 2:90 runs on 6L6's, which is nice. However, it really is probably more power than I need, as already discussed. I mentioned it above because, well, if the right one came along I'd still be interested!]