Mesa Booie Mark IV rev B

  • Thread starter Thread starter hopkinWFG
  • Start date Start date
H

hopkinWFG

Well-known member
Hiya Peeps... just like to seek any advise if i would really really need a Mesa Mark IV rev B.... i been hearing LOG for quite sometimes and it become apparent that i like the tone of the LOG and i think getting a Mark IV would be a wish comes true... but much of the amps i have got here... the Diezel, Bogners a Wizard and Fryettes.... does it still require me to acquire a Mark 4 ? does the tone quality and versatility matches the amps i got here and i wont be disappointed in?
 
Thanks not really how to describe them... i just like how different high gain amp sound and their feel... just like to clear out some misunderstanding here... Between the Mark IV rev B and A, disregarding the front "Boogie" and "Mesa Boogie" name plate, the rev B or A is understood by the effect loop layout ? or does the Rev B or A comes certain with the "Boogie" / "Mesa boogie" nameplate as well?
 
Cool !! have check the clips over youtube and i prefer much the Rev B which has more lowend and less bright if we are on the same page? but probably such subtleties could be dial out.... Thanks alot for your help @creep66
 
I sold my mark IV kept the mk 3++ .but I think you would like mk 4 . It’s LOG all day
 
Thanks not really how to describe them... i just like how different high gain amp sound and their feel... just like to clear out some misunderstanding here... Between the Mark IV rev B and A, disregarding the front "Boogie" and "Mesa Boogie" name plate, the rev B or A is understood by the effect loop layout ? or does the Rev B or A comes certain with the "Boogie" / "Mesa boogie" nameplate as well?
https://mesaboogie.zendesk.com/hc/e... can I tell if,Loops (NORMAL and SWITCHABLE).
 
what the Mark 3 has that have you sold ya Mark 4?
Every MKIII I ever played through had a raspier angrier sounding drive channel. At least that's what my ears heard. Lots of people still prefer it over the MKIV. I should have bought a MKIII back in 2014 when they were $700-800 on the used market.

Gotta say though, I'm dumb-happy as a clam with my 2 recently refurbished MKIV Rev A's.

02k8Ywv.jpg
 
Last edited:
what the Mark 3 has that have you sold ya Mark 4?
I set them up and they both came out so close . More agressive for me . But you should get a mark IV since you love LOG so much , but I will say I get LOG tones just fine with my 3++
 
Every MKIII I ever played through had a raspier angrier sounding drive channel. At least that's what my ears heard. Lots of people still prefer it over the MKIV. I should have bought a MKIII back in 2014 when they were $700-800 on the used market.

Gotta say though, I'm dumb-happy as clam with my 2 recently refurbished MKIV Rev A's.

02k8Ywv.jpg
This is why I like mk 3 best . You nailed it
 
I set them up and they both came out so close . More agressive for me . But you should get a mark IV since you love LOG so much , but I will say I get LOG tones just fine with my 3++
especially the album Wake of the ashes... that album is classic ... that said the tones i like next was unearth... their album recorded with the Fryette in the eyes of fire ... its crazy !!
 
Every MKIII I ever played through had a raspier angrier sounding drive channel. At least that's what my ears heard. Lots of people still prefer it over the MKIV. I should have bought a MKIII back in 2014 when they were $700-800 on the used market.

Gotta say though, I'm dumb-happy as clam with my 2 recently refurbished MKIV Rev A's.

02k8Ywv.jpg
Nice collection of the Marks haha...
 
especially the album Wake of the ashes... that album is classic ... that said the tones i like next was unearth... their album recorded with the Fryette in the eyes of fire ... its crazy !!
I seriously get tones like ashes on my mk 3++ . But like I said mark 4 is LOG all the way. I honestly think the mk 4 combos sound better than the heads. Might be best amp I ever heard . It’s what got me into amps . My friend one that just slayed
 
Back
Top