
university81
Active member
I realise a video comparing the two would be ideal, but unfortunately I don't have anything setup in our practice room, and using my mobile phone would just be terrible for want of better words =0
Maybe this interests some people , I'm quite a delay afficianado had few in my time ( EHX SMM with hazarai, Akai Headrush, Carl Martin Red Repeat, MXR CC - Boss DD-6)
I use the Line6 M9 on my board now together with the Flashback delay and a DD-6 (for the phrase sampling feature/hold)
//
I received the Flashback delay yesterday, and spent a good 2-3 hours playing with it, really addictive pedal, the dotted eighths setting will make you lose all notion of time and space =0
The delay sounds in the various modes are all very pristine/studio sounding and clear but not overly processed/digital sounding, it takes up about the size of the polytune (same casing as far as i can see), and is very straightforward to use. My particular favourites are the 2290 , Analog, Tape, Mod and toneprint modes (more on toneprint later).
The MXR CC in comparison, has a much darker liquid like tone/feel to it, maybe more natural sounding as it molds more into the background instead of being really clear/defined (part of the analog nature of the pedal i guess). The mod/chorus engaged also is quite subtle but adds a nice lush character, it definitely has it's place on anyone's pedalboard
The deciding factor for me was simply flexibility, while I would engage the MXR CC for adding a more subtle delay sound/atmosphere the Flashback has that and more, including a useful tap tempo feature, (the looper is a great addition but i can use the m9 for that),
also the toneprint mode on the flashback, the default toneprint supplied with the flashback is actually quite close to the MXR CC in terms of sound, not quite there but pretty close, and the analog setting on the flashback is almost as nice but clearer sounding (I don't think brighter is the right term just clearer with 'analog' characteristics).
If TC release a toneprint editor, (which imo they really should) then it's a huge homerun, the stefan schackinger toneprint for example is real nice, you can set the feedback really high on it for example so it self'oscillates in the background without blowing up in terms of volume, so you have pad like effects, without needing to fiddle with knobs, the self'oscillation of the MXR is crazy =0 just have to control it with the knobs unless you want to go deaf lol
The extra features etc are really well explained in the official TC vid
TLDR:
- The MXR CC has it's own thing, lush/dark natural sounding delays
- The Flashback has enormous flexibility, studio/pristine/clear delays with lots of features in a compact polytune sized enclosure
-The Flashback can get close to the MXR CC sounding delays, wheras the CC is stuck to it's own thing which it does very well i'd add
//
I'm selling the MXR now to finance the flashback so to say, but I'd keep it if I could as it has it's place, but if you're trying to decide between the two new, the flashback is not only cheaper but more flexible.
Maybe this interests some people , I'm quite a delay afficianado had few in my time ( EHX SMM with hazarai, Akai Headrush, Carl Martin Red Repeat, MXR CC - Boss DD-6)
I use the Line6 M9 on my board now together with the Flashback delay and a DD-6 (for the phrase sampling feature/hold)
//
I received the Flashback delay yesterday, and spent a good 2-3 hours playing with it, really addictive pedal, the dotted eighths setting will make you lose all notion of time and space =0
The delay sounds in the various modes are all very pristine/studio sounding and clear but not overly processed/digital sounding, it takes up about the size of the polytune (same casing as far as i can see), and is very straightforward to use. My particular favourites are the 2290 , Analog, Tape, Mod and toneprint modes (more on toneprint later).
The MXR CC in comparison, has a much darker liquid like tone/feel to it, maybe more natural sounding as it molds more into the background instead of being really clear/defined (part of the analog nature of the pedal i guess). The mod/chorus engaged also is quite subtle but adds a nice lush character, it definitely has it's place on anyone's pedalboard
The deciding factor for me was simply flexibility, while I would engage the MXR CC for adding a more subtle delay sound/atmosphere the Flashback has that and more, including a useful tap tempo feature, (the looper is a great addition but i can use the m9 for that),
also the toneprint mode on the flashback, the default toneprint supplied with the flashback is actually quite close to the MXR CC in terms of sound, not quite there but pretty close, and the analog setting on the flashback is almost as nice but clearer sounding (I don't think brighter is the right term just clearer with 'analog' characteristics).
If TC release a toneprint editor, (which imo they really should) then it's a huge homerun, the stefan schackinger toneprint for example is real nice, you can set the feedback really high on it for example so it self'oscillates in the background without blowing up in terms of volume, so you have pad like effects, without needing to fiddle with knobs, the self'oscillation of the MXR is crazy =0 just have to control it with the knobs unless you want to go deaf lol
The extra features etc are really well explained in the official TC vid
TLDR:
- The MXR CC has it's own thing, lush/dark natural sounding delays
- The Flashback has enormous flexibility, studio/pristine/clear delays with lots of features in a compact polytune sized enclosure
-The Flashback can get close to the MXR CC sounding delays, wheras the CC is stuck to it's own thing which it does very well i'd add
//
I'm selling the MXR now to finance the flashback so to say, but I'd keep it if I could as it has it's place, but if you're trying to decide between the two new, the flashback is not only cheaper but more flexible.