P
parntz145
Active member
I sat down with my tech and we went back and forth between bone and graphite. If you can hear a tone difference between the 2 of them you have ears better than GOD. I bet if I blind folded you would never be able to tell the difference. Once you press down on a string the nut is out of play. If there is any vibration behind where you are pressing it is miniscule and not going to make a tonal difference. Im not going to argue if it makes you feel better to have bone than thats great. I just know what I heard and ill stick with the graphite for better tuning on my Les Paul. Afterall thats why I took the bone nut off in the first place. Plus you are playing an electric not an acoustic. You have distortion and effects going on.Strat+Marshall":2a4ftfls said:parntz145":2a4ftfls said:I also would go with the graphite over the bone. Stays in tune better. Dont listen to the BS about bone having better tone to it. After you fret a chord it doesnt matter what the nut is made of. I went through this big debate about bone being the best. Graphite works better for tuning issues and if you didnt know what it was made of you wouldnt know the difference between it and bone. I had both.
The string is still vibrating behind were it is being fretted and the vibrations will go back into the neck through the nut. I have changed out way too many nuts from one material to another to believe your BS.