
MetalHeadMike
Well-known member
Tried rolling the same preamp tubes through v1 only on the Wizard yesterday to see if I'd hear anything differently. Well...this time I did hear variations between tubes. I set the amp at fairly low volume and sat right in front of the cabs. I also left all controls on the amp set the same for every tube. I think this was part of the reason I previously perceived little difference between them.
I was inadvertently compensating with eq each time I swapped a tube previously allowing each tubes slight difference to be negated. This time I could hear/feel definitive changes in mid content, compression, pick attack. That said, it's still not earth shattering, life changing differences between them here.
The NOS tubes (6n4 square getters, and RCA AT7) had the least gain/compression and the most open gain structure and the most woody tone for lack of a better word. Still plenty of pick attack and a fairly aggressive tone.
The Tungsol seemed the most hifi for lack of a better word, had significant compression, and lacked some of the pick attack many others had. Somewhat smooth, but very articulate.
The JJEcc803s surprisingly had the most aggressive attack in the upper mids/treble; in this amp anyway.
The Chinese 12zx7B were very aggressive with loads of pick attack; I like these a lot in this amp"s v1 slot.
The made in Poland "Real time" labeled ECC??? was the most compressed smoothest tube of them all but still aggressive and tight.
The TAD 5751 didn't yield that much gain reduction but was slightly clearer.
TAD 7025s what my least favorite; just seemed to lack the pick attack the others had.
TAD 7025 was very similar to the 7025s but a touch more pronounced pick attack.
Tried a JJ ECC81 (AT7), RCA AT7, JJ ECC803S (supposedly balanced for PI) & a Sovtek LPS in what I assume was the PI slot(v6) and like the JJ ECC803s the best I think.
I was inadvertently compensating with eq each time I swapped a tube previously allowing each tubes slight difference to be negated. This time I could hear/feel definitive changes in mid content, compression, pick attack. That said, it's still not earth shattering, life changing differences between them here.
The NOS tubes (6n4 square getters, and RCA AT7) had the least gain/compression and the most open gain structure and the most woody tone for lack of a better word. Still plenty of pick attack and a fairly aggressive tone.
The Tungsol seemed the most hifi for lack of a better word, had significant compression, and lacked some of the pick attack many others had. Somewhat smooth, but very articulate.
The JJEcc803s surprisingly had the most aggressive attack in the upper mids/treble; in this amp anyway.
The Chinese 12zx7B were very aggressive with loads of pick attack; I like these a lot in this amp"s v1 slot.
The made in Poland "Real time" labeled ECC??? was the most compressed smoothest tube of them all but still aggressive and tight.
The TAD 5751 didn't yield that much gain reduction but was slightly clearer.
TAD 7025s what my least favorite; just seemed to lack the pick attack the others had.
TAD 7025 was very similar to the 7025s but a touch more pronounced pick attack.
Tried a JJ ECC81 (AT7), RCA AT7, JJ ECC803S (supposedly balanced for PI) & a Sovtek LPS in what I assume was the PI slot(v6) and like the JJ ECC803s the best I think.