Lucked out, was pretty much a direct swap for my black face rev e I had.Looks amazing!
You must have paid an arm and a leg for that surely.
love it
Hell yeah, man. They’re like a different amp. Idk how Mesa hasn’t tried to jump on remaking the early recs just releasing an amp called rev C or a legit only 2C++ (I know the jp2c and mark 5 out there, JP is way closer, but still not it) just seems like a missed opportunity. It’s pretty nuts how good the early rectos can sound even without a boost.Congrats man!
Early Rectos are insanely good. Like almost unrelated in any way to a G. At least my C is.
How did they compare side by side?Nice!
Congrats man! Those are phenomenal sounding amps!
I used to have a Rev E too. Ended up selling to just keep a Rev C.
What's the serial number on yours?
Rev G was the start of the parallel loop; although I've read that some very late Rev Fs can have them, and some super early Rev Gs can have serial loops. Around #2800-#3200 serial range. My last F Triple had a Serial loop and was #2992. If I remember right.Does this have a stock serial loop, or has it been modded to that? I can never remember when exactly they went to the parallel.
Stock serial. Switches over at some point in the rev fs I believe.Does this have a stock serial loop, or has it been modded to that? I can never remember when exactly they went to the parallel.
Late 500s. She sounds so good! I like the brightness and cut of the e’s.Nice!
Congrats man! Those are phenomenal sounding amps!
I used to have a Rev E too. Ended up selling to just keep a Rev C.
What's the serial number on yours?
They have the same Rectifier DNA, but the C is a bit more aggressive, with a bit more mids and grind and gain, while the E was a bit more scooped and softer sounding. But just a tiny bit. The low end on the Rev C was also a hair tighter than the more pillowy low end of the Rev E.How did they compare side by side?
Mine was #0590Late 500s. She sounds so good! I like the brightness and cut of the e’s.
They have the same Rectifier DNA, but the C is a bit more aggressive, with a bit more mids and grind and gain, while the E was a bit more scooped and softer sounding. But just a tiny bit. The low end on the Rev C was also a hair tighter than the more pillowy low end of the Rev E.
Here is an A/B of both:
Mine was #0590