7 Stringer":9txgp4zr said:
Ha ha, good to hear. I get ya on the kids groing up and freeing some time. I'm there now too!!!!! I just started skydiving, damn man, what a rush. Getting my license next week, did half an hour of wind tunnel last night woah, that's cool. Now I'm ready for my 9 free fall jumps, alone. Did a couple tandem jumps last week. Next is the real thing. Anyways.....
No prob on the comparison, I'm curious about your thoughts on this, always liked your tone on the Zombie album. Still listen to it. I'm really anxious to get another Peters on the go.
Thanks Gav,
Chris
Whoa, that's awesome! You crazy guy. You got any vids? That'd be cool to see.
I don't think I could jump out of a plane. They'd have to push me out.
Thanks for the kind words mate. Good to hear the music is still getting some mileage ha!
Between the Gryphon and the GNL, the differences are mostly subtle.
The GNL has that Gryphon tonal DNA, but with a little leaner footprint and a bit more gain/aggression/attack.
It can be dialed back to imitate the Gryphon's warmth, but it doesn't quite get as thick.
You know how the Gryphon has that thick, chewy, molasses sound? Well the GNL gets close, but doesn't get it exactly.
Close enough for me though.
But that growl that I love in the Gryphon's voicing is definitely present in the GNL.
And it has the same sort of open high-end as the Gryphon.
Also, much like the Gryphon the GNL is still very responsive to input.
With the right guitar/pickup the GNL can get very close to the Gryphon sound.
I have a clip at home of my Charvel superstrat with a Seymour Duncan PATB2 Distortion that gets a very thick chewy tone through the GNL.
It's fairly different sounding to my last few vids/clips of my GNL.
I'll post it up later in the week.
Hope this helps man.
I also found an old post you may have missed that outlines the differences I found between the Hydra, Gryphon and GNL:
"My experience of the Hydra VS Gryphon/GNL...
HYDRA:
For my gear and the way I play, the Hydra is the perfect lead amp.
Thick, juicy and rich. Liquid and effortless to play. Single notes really sing when playing solos through the Hydra.
It's got more saturation and compression than the Gryphon, and as a result it sounds more sticky and elastic.
If I could afford a triple channel Peters amp, I'd get the Hydra as the lead channel. No contest.
For the way I play rhythm and riffage though, the Hydra isn't exactly my thing.
I like to dial my amp's gain down and hit the preamp hard with highly resonant guitars and med-high output pickups.
And way before I tried the Hydra, I found my perfect rhythm sound in the Gryphon with this approach.
Since discovering that sound, I've found that no other amp compares.
The Hydra is still a great sound for rhythm tones, but for me and the way I play it's just a little too thick and grunty.
GRYPHON/GNL:
The Gryphon and GNL both have a very similar tonal footprint with the key difference being the GNL has more gain and a leaner low-end.
Both have a plinky attack and open, strident highs in comparison to the Hydra's rich bloom and slightly attenuated highs.
And the mids on the Gryphon/GNL have more of a growl going on rather than the Hydra's grunt.
So when it comes to rhythm and riffage, all these characteristics of the Gryphon/GNL variants just work the best for me and my equipment.
The Gryphon/GNL is no slouch in terms of lead tones, but after owning the Hydra I can attest that the Hydra does it better.
When it comes to soloing and single notes, the Gryphon/GNL can feel a little stiff. I have to work harder when soloing on the Gryphon/GNL.
On the other hand, the Hydra seems to coax the notes out from under my fingers and has more complexity to the tones overall.
I'm more of a rhythm/riff guy than a lead guy, so that's where my priorities lie.
Presented with only one high-gain channel option, I chose to compromise on the lead tones and stick with the Gryphon/GNL channel.
But if I could afford a triple channel or wanted to prioritise soloing , I'd choose the Hydra without a second thought."