jmgman69":3fhe6m0w said:
jmgman69":3fhe6m0w said:
Buckeyedog":3fhe6m0w said:
When we went by, the dude on the 7 string was playing on a Recto of some sort and I couldn't even hear it and I was within 7 or 8 feet of the amp!! Wish we could have taken this amp to the amp show on Saturday and cranked it up. That would have been very cool. All I know is that I got to hear a Bones in person and was amazed at the tone at low volume. Crazy good.
Most definietly,Me and a buddy stopped by the Stictly 7 booth on Sunday and really wanted to check out the Satan but when I asked,some guy I think his name was Curran....said if sucked,no gain,was thin and nobody wanted to hear hear it,I thought he was kidding

but he wasn't,we thought the guy was a fucking tool!!!!!
Oh,and I forgot mushy,he said
He actually said the Natas had no gain, was thin, and mushy? Tool is right

. Tone preference is subjective so maybe he didn't like it for whatever reason, but the descriptions he used aren't exactly what I'd call subjective. I mean what he said would be like saying the Uberschall has no end

. The Natas has more gain than anyone would ever need. Thin? Dial up the 6irth and you could play thick sludge metal tones. Mushy? I've never played a more responsive or faster tracking modern amp. If he knows of an amp that makes the Natas seem gainless, thin, & mushy in comparison sign me up

. No one is forcing him to like the amp, but he doesn't have to be so unprofessional in a setting like that and spew a bunch of garbage about it either

.