NYC Department Of Education Children’s Show Features 12 Minutes Of ‘Lil Miss Hot Mess

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMP2203
  • Start date Start date
^^^^^
Amazing the show got away with that character in a prime time TV slot.
They must have received thousands of complaints with each episode he was on.

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Axstar713 said:
What do I mean? I think that is pretty easy to discern from the topic at hand - drag queens.

And Disney? They're zionist scum who push all kinds of bullshit on unwitting children so no surprise there.
Click to expand...

What about the 100 or so restaurants/theaters all across the country (even in deeply red states)
that feature ALL-AGES as well as adult only Drag Queen shows several nights a week?

What about the 100s of thousands of people paying all the money to see the shows? Again,
even in bible belt areas?

It's too mainstream everywhere, and has been for well over a decade.
Stop always thinking dirty about it.

I know some 1000% straight folks that have seen a Drag show and said it was a really great time
and piss your pants hilarious.
 
[ Donnie B. ] said:
Drag Queens & Glam Rockers.

What's the difference to a 10 year old kid?
Click to expand...
I'm sure a 10-year-old can tell the difference between a bunch of dudes trying to look, talk, walk and dress like women and another bunch of dudes trying to look cool (the glam rockers). I thought the pics I posted made that clear, the post being a response to your glam-rocker pics.

The glam rockers didn't wear dresses and talk like women, for example. The makeup's a fantasy thing, just like KISS but not as OTT.

[ Donnie B. ] said:
Earlier someone mentioned a fireman or nurse would be more appropriate for a school.
These two OK?

View attachment 79895
Click to expand...
I don't see why not, Donnie.

Just 'cause the nurse and firewoman may be gay is another matter entirely, and not a distinction young kids are likely to be able to discern or be sensitive to.

To them, I'd guess, they'd simply be a nurse and a fire fighter. Nothin' wrong with those as figures of aspiration to the young 'uns I reckon.
 
Monkey Man said:
To them, I'd guess, they'd simply be a nurse and a fire fighter. Nothin' wrong with those as figures of aspiration to the young 'uns I reckon.
Click to expand...

First off, thanks for actually initiating a conversation rather than just tossing insults.

For the record, I 100% see your point and am playing devil's advocate quite a bit here.
I see Drag Queens in the 21st century as entertainers no different that Glam Elton John or Kiss.
The immediate association between Drag Queen and 'QUEER!', 'DEVIANT', 'CHILD MOLESTER!' just
strikes me as so outdated, and somewhat offensive.

Your openness to the gay nurse and firefighter visiting a school is cool. Not sure some in this thread
feel as you do though.
 
You're too-kind, Donnie; thanks mate.

I think the boys here would be more-accepting of the gay nurse and firefighter's visitations on the young kids than you think 'though. It's kinda-obvious to most adults that kids below age 10 generally don't pick up on the subtleties of effeminate behaviour in men or "butch" in women. Instead they just see a man or a woman. No GayDar™ developed yet as they have no concept of the whole thing.

It's obvious to me that those against drag queens "edumacating" kids are simply wary of sending signals to the impressionable that choosing to tart yourself up and get around in a dress is an acceptable lifestyle choice for a man. Maybe later on a kid will gravitate to that sort of thing, sure, but in the meantime, during formative years, parents tend to want to steer their kids in the safest directions, those proven to maximise the possibilities of long-term happiness and success.

In essence, I feel it boils down to parents' wanting to protect and preserve those precious few years where one is free to be a kid. Let the growing-up part happen later, naturally, IOW. I'm sure you see this too.
 
Last edited:
[ Donnie B. ] said:
Drag Queens & Glam Rockers.

What's the difference to a 10 year old kid?

It's obvious what the difference is to some of you fellas....

Earlier someone mentioned a fireman or nurse would be more appropriate for a school.
These two OK?

View attachment 79895
Click to expand...
Extreme examples, because there are plenty of male nurses out there, you just chose the one with pink scrubs and his arm on his hip standing in a feminine posture. Like a gay little teapot of some sort. ?

Plenty of women firefighters too, you just chose the one with the short butch haircut.

Nice try cherry picker
 
Monkey Man said:
are simply wary of sending signals to the impressionable that choosing to tart yourself up and get around in a dress is an acceptable lifestyle choice
Click to expand...

In much the same way the kids' GayDar (I'll see you in court over that little TM buddy... ) hasn't developed yet,
I doubt them seeing a man ridiculously overdressed as a caricature of a woman is any different than seeing
someone dressed as a pirate or a purple dinosaur.

You using the word 'tart' shows your bias being injected. The only tart a kid knows is the sour candy one.

Eventually those little kids grow up into adults.
What's the difference between an adult that's homophobic and one that isn't?

I don't know the answer but I think part of it is buried within the conversation we're having.
 
Last edited:
[ Donnie B. ] said:
In much the same way the kids' GayDar (I'll see you in court over that little TM buddy... ) hasn't developed yet,
I doubt them seeing a man ridiculously overdressed as a caricature of a woman is any different than seeing
someone dressed as a pirate or a purple dinosaur.
Click to expand...
Fair point, Donnie; I'll grant you that.

I hadn't thought the caricature aspect right-through, although I'd still have reservations about the kids' being able to differentiate between caricatures and the real thing.

[ Donnie B. ] said:
You using the word 'tart' shows your bias being injected. The only tart a kid knows is the sour candy one.
Click to expand...
No mate; it's not an indicator of bias. In the two countries I grew up in (South Africa and Australia), to "tart one's self up" is simply to overdo the makeup, and if drag queens are guilty of anything it's, shall we say, over-employing makeup. I think the same expression is used in the UK.

It's not the same as calling a woman a tart.
 
Metalhex said:
Extreme examples, because there are plenty of male nurses out there, you just chose the one with pink scrubs and his arm on his hip standing in a feminine posture. Like a gay little teapot of some sort. ?

Plenty of women firefighters too, you just chose the one with the short butch haircut.

Nice try cherry picker
Click to expand...
Donald does what he can to make it fit his narrative.
 
Light me a fag, Donnie Boy. :LOL: No worries, mate.:cheers:

Hey, I'm conservative but my only bias is in favouring old-school values. It doesn't follow that I ought be bigoted, anything-phobic or whatever. I believe in freedom of choice and don't hold folks' lifestyle choices against them; each to his own, I say.

To hold freedom of choice as dearly as I do, it'd be hypocritical of me to then turn around and undermine the decisions of others in this regard. Each of us has to live with the consequences of his or her behaviour/s and lifestyle choices, after all, so in the grand scheme of things it'd be redundant to pile on and add to suffering of others needlessly - the opportunities for learning are already abundantly provided by the accountability society demands.
 
Happy friday guys!
z3l3c2gsztg51.jpg
 
:worship: :rock::cheers2:

Name? I don't recognise her, hard as that is to believe, Brother CentristNutz. :confused::LOL:
 
I grew up in North NJ/NYC area in the 80s and 90s and I'm pretty sure that by age 7-8 I was already aware of what a drag queen was and seen them in person.

Film or not, you're not getting too much of a sheltered childhood if you grow up in NYC lol
 
guitarbilly74 said:
Growing up in North NJ/NYC area in the 80s and 90s, you were not getting too much of a sheltered childhood.
Click to expand...

Hope you don't mind my paraphrase.

1980s-1990s was thirty-forty YEARS ago!!

Almost a half a century later and we still have folks right here in a god damn
ROCK MUSICIANS forum who will stigmatize the profession.

Mind blowing.



I can just imagine what threads on the subject must be like in Bible Study Forums.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top