Kapo_Polenton":2gpnehst said:
Maybe something like the below? Borrowed from the Ceriatone site with the only diff being the fact that there is no control over levels. That leaves me wondering whether or not this design would only be for line level gear or instrument level gear? Would be ideal because could be stuck on a switch..
No, you definitely would not want this. This is a passive loop and not a buffered one. Tone suck city here
How does the Granger sound with pedals. The reason I ask is you said you are using a G-Major II.
The G-Major II digitizes the analog guitar signal (dry) and causes a weird phase shift. It does not pass analog signal though it. It converts the dry signal to digital and back to dry again. It is much better used in parallel loop. Most good rack units keep the dry signal analog and don't convert it to digital and then back to analog. The ADA converts IMO are crap in the G-major II.
I have owned some pretty good rack gear and the G-major II was the worst as far as dry signal was concerned.
Also with nothing plugged into the loop do you get the same tone changes with the loop switch switched in? Because this will put the loop between the preamp and power amp. If so it is the loop, if not it is the G-major II
I wonder if Grainger copied the Mojotone loop exactly, the PCB almost looks identical including the trace design. If so they also copied a design flaw too. In the Mojotone loop they use a 470K resistor on the return side of the loop which is not needed since the return side is trying to increase the gain back up since it was attenuated on the send side. This causes the highs to be rolled off quite a bit. The fix is to replace it with a .022uF capacitor.
I have modded several amps with the Mojotone loop and have had to modify it to work correctly.
I can't understand why most can't design a quality loop

It is not that hard