Parker Custom Shop Norse Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter FourT6and2
  • Start date Start date
FourT6and2

FourT6and2

Well-known member
Any thoughts on the Parker Custom Shop? Do they do good work? I came across a Norse-themed series seen here: http://www.wrighttoneguitars.com/norse_ ... ection.php

I especially liked the looks of the "Loki." But cedar probably isn't the best wood choice for the sound I'd go for. So I was thinking of seeing if I could get one made with Korina or some other hardwood. Maybe zebra wood? And possibly the other body shape, the Maxxfly? Looks more like a standard body shape.

I like that they don't have piezo and the trem and all the other gadgets. Keep it simple. Two pickups, volume/tone, hard tail bridge. Done.

1_ParkerFly_Loki_butterfly.jpg


6_ParkerFly_Loki_detail.jpg
 
FourT6and2":3p6gq815 said:
Rezamatix":3p6gq815 said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)
 
Badronald":1zwaorx0 said:
FourT6and2":1zwaorx0 said:
Rezamatix":1zwaorx0 said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)

lol Well I have two of those already. Looking to branch out and try something different. And purple is my favorite color! And I like natural finish guitars too. I think a lot of the finishes on guitars are pretty gaudy and cheap looking. I want to see the natural wood.
 
Rezamatix":2fkp9gco said:
Badronald":2fkp9gco said:
FourT6and2":2fkp9gco said:
Rezamatix":2fkp9gco said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)


Firstly, Les Paul's in general are awesome guitars.
Secondly, the MEH factor was from a purely cosmetic standpoint.
Thirdly, I have many guitars that are not Les Paul's so chill on the micro aggression.

Ha! The irony is ironic with this one. :thumbsup:
 
Rezamatix":suexkjwc said:
Badronald":suexkjwc said:
FourT6and2":suexkjwc said:
Rezamatix":suexkjwc said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)


Firstly, Les Paul's in general are awesome guitars.
Secondly, the MEH factor was from a purely cosmetic standpoint.
Thirdly, I have many guitars that are not Les Paul's so chill on the micro aggression.

I'm really interested in getting info from people who have played Parker guitars. As far as the aesthetics go, that's more personal. If I were to actually order one from their Custom Shop, it would most likely be the Maxx Fly body shape and instead of Cedar, maybe something like korina/limba, zircote, zebrawood, or macassar ebony. But still with the purple back haha!

750-DF1024Koa_angle.jpg

img_4255.jpg


RTaylorStyl1-ziric_792902.jpg

7-25-13-Ziricote.jpg

bronbk.jpg

ps5d.jpg



I also found this, which while very different from above, is still pretty cool. Kinda glows. Looks like the Hulk haha. Maybe one in purple would be right up my alley!

b_zpsa087b966.jpg

f_zps1f96a37d.jpg

i_zps0dc82a3c.jpg

22_zps896e8a5c.jpg

55_zps92cdca43.jpg
 
Dig the first and last you posted. No experience, but I'd rock either or both. Interested, let us know what you find out.
 
Rezamatix":3ax50ui0 said:
Badronald":3ax50ui0 said:
FourT6and2":3ax50ui0 said:
Rezamatix":3ax50ui0 said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)


Firstly, Les Paul's in general are awesome guitars.
Secondly, the MEH factor was from a purely cosmetic standpoint.
Thirdly, I have many guitars that are not Les Paul's so chill on the micro aggression.

I don't think "micro aggression" means what you think it means.

I've never played a Parker Custom Shop, but I do have and play a Fly Mojo, and its a very precise, well-built instrument. They're not for everyone, but their weight coupled with the tone they produce makes them pretty interesting when compared to more traditional guitars.
 
FourT6and2":mfznszzr said:
I'm really interested in getting info from people who have played Parker guitars. As far as the aesthetics go, that's more personal. If I were to actually order one from their Custom Shop, it would most likely be the Maxx Fly body shape and instead of Cedar, maybe something like korina/limba, zircote, zebrawood, or macassar ebony. But still with the purple back haha!

I have a Nitefly and a Fly Classic, both from late 90's. I haven't owned a MaxxFly but I have been able to try one out. These Norse based models appear to have more in common with my Fly Classic.

Parkers are the most stable guitars I have ever seen, largely due to the composite exoskeleton on the neck and back of the body. They put these guitars into a vacuum sealed oven and bake the exoskeleton onto the guitar. I have never had to adjust the truss rods, once set, they've been good to go (I have had my Nitefly since 1998 and my Fly Classic for about 4 years). I have never had to make seasonal adjustments.

Stainless steel frets are a win for me, they do make bending notes easy. The frets on both my Parkers still show no sign of wear. It doesn't look like those Norse models have the piezo. That's not a big loss. You can blend them in for some interesting clean tones, use them exclusively to get a more acoustic sounding tone, but they don't quite replace a real acoustic. The Parker designed bridges are sturdy, mine have the trem and I'd miss it if I switched to one of these Norse Flys. They have been as stable as Floyd Rose for me. That said, you might get better sustain with those fixed bridges.

The reason for the lower weight is the extreme cutaways. Pictures do not do them justice, you have to see them in person to get it. These guitars are very thin. The original Flys had specially designed pickups, regular pickups were too deep to fit. This could be a problem if you don't like the stock pickups. Both of my Parkers are stock, never felt the need to change them.

They don't look like other guitars, they aren't built like other guitars, so they don't sound like other guitars either, especially the low weight Fly models. If you want LP tones, Tele tones or Strat tones then this is probably not the guitar for you unless you are happy owning all those other guitars too ;) I find my Fly classic to be very clear, articulate. I set my amp differently for my various guitars, when using my Parker I tend to increase the bass and lower mids a bit.

The newer MaxxFly/DragonFly body corrects a couple of issues with the original design. I prefer the look of the original design, but the upper horn will poke you if you try hunching forward when you sit with the guitar. The new body shape doesn't have that sharp upper horn, and it looks a bit more conventional. Also, the original headstock shape doesn't work with wall hangers where the new headstock shape will.

They are great guitars, but they aren't for everyone. Try one first, or get one from a dealer with a good return policy.
 
When you said Norse I was expecting the guitar to look like a battle axe or have carvings all over them ;)

Now THIS is Norse...

tumblr_ml8186XIq21s8183so3_1280.jpg
 
nigelpkay":1taep61g said:
When you said Norse I was expecting the guitar to look like a battle axe or have carvings all over them ;)

Now THIS is Norse...

tumblr_ml8186XIq21s8183so3_1280.jpg

that's more like it :rock:
I agree with Reza though, nothing about a Parker guitar excites me. I wouldn't care if they used diamonds for fretwire - they're pretty lifeless
 
Badronald":2df58aw8 said:
Rezamatix":2df58aw8 said:
Badronald":2df58aw8 said:
FourT6and2":2df58aw8 said:
Rezamatix":2df58aw8 said:
serious MEH factor here.

Why's that? They don't sound good or play well?

Don't bother. If it's not a Les Paul Custom with an ebony board you couldn't possibly make music with it. ;)


Firstly, Les Paul's in general are awesome guitars.
Secondly, the MEH factor was from a purely cosmetic standpoint.
Thirdly, I have many guitars that are not Les Paul's so chill on the micro aggression.

Ha! The irony is ironic with this one. :thumbsup:

No shit. :yes:
 
I had a Parker fly years ago, should have never sold it, I've been looking for one ever since. Very well made guitars, action is awesome, as stated above, adjustments never have to be made to them, ss frets essentially don't wear, ad with the piezo system you can can a broad sound spectrum with it. Is that a 7 string fly up there? I didn't know they made those! Now I'm gonna have to get one!
 
UberschallEL34":32vb7i5l said:
they're pretty lifeless

Again, as with the other comments... is this a reference to how they play and sound or to how they look?
 
from my experience - both. Sure some of them look sleek and futuristic, but they aren't for me. The ones I've picked up and played felt fine in terms of fit and finish but they were dead to my ears. But hey don't let anyone sway you if you want one. Get 2.

I have a PRS P22 that has the acoustic piezo bridge and it's a killer guitar. Sorry - I'm no Parker fan.
 
A friend of mine had one of the first ones, the high end model. They were extremely light weight, but the necks felt good. I'm not a fan of painted necks, but the steel frets and the profile were nice. The piezo was a nice feature, but I didn't care for the trem. It was c springs, which felt strange to me. The guitar was quality, and the passives sounded good. Plugged in, I don't know if someone could tell the difference between that guitar and a super strat. They are good guitars, if you have back issues, probably a great guitar. If you are looking for a piezo/passive combo, personally I preferred the Petrucci or an Ibanez (because I liked the trems better), but you have to mod those to do both on at the same time.

If you want to hear and see them in action, look up Dave Martone on youtube. He for one is one of the best players out there, and two, uses both piezo and passive at the same time, so he really gets a unique sound out of it.
 
Just to be clear, the guitar I'm looking at here has no trem. And no piezo. I hate both and would never own a guitar with either. So yeah, I guess no difference from a typical super strat of axe. But hey, I haven't found an ESP or similar guitar I've really liked. I'm heading to a local shop this weekend to check out some Parkers. Maybe I'll hate them lol. Who knows.

I'm a simple guy. All I need is two humbuckers and a fixed bridge.
 
from my experience with parker, they play like a dream and sound like what they're made of. The tone is a bit to be desired for me, and I grew up playing RG 550's and basswood.
 
Back
Top