Good point. I think it actually better reflects midwit elite-ambitious class, which is why I suggested you’d probably get similar results with just the advanced degree minus salary criteria.
Why do you think that? I took a brief glance at the methodology and it doesn’t appear biased by design.
Again I agree that their criteria doesn’t really reflect the “elite.” That being said, it reflects a relevant demographic, which I determined to be the educated ambitious class, managerial class, perhaps the new “bourgeoisie.” What do you think?
It wasn't a Zerohedge poll, but it does appear that the group responsible is partisan and perhaps biased. Regardless, it was conducted by Rasmussen and appears to be valid, barring some details that we aren't aware of. Whatever you want to call the group, I think it is a striking finding and in fact it appears that there is a relationship with certain beliefs, geographical demographics (city) and income.
That's a pretty big omission. Polling is supposed to be transparent so that it can be replicated and validated.
I’m just saying unless there is something we’re not being told. I’ll check to see if Rasmussen has more on it, but theoretically you should have enough to replicate the study based on what they described. I don’t think dismissing it based on the possibility of poor design is justified.
