Question: Marshall logo for a JMP 2203/2204?

[Rampage]

Hey guys, I was wondering if anyone would be able to help me out. I've got a 1980 Marshall JMP 2203 that is currently logoless. I'd like to grab a new logo for it, however, I don't want to get the wrong size. Would it be the 9" or 11" plastic logo? I'd measure it myself, but it is currently waiting in the shop.

Thanks in advance.

 

[bravedude2]

9 inch. I think

bragger!
check with George at metro amp.

 

[goldwing68nv]

i have a '80 JMP 2203 at home.i'll check on the "logo" size and post it,later tonite,when i'm home from work.

 

[goldwing68nv]

well...i just measured the MARSHALL logo and,from end to end,it measures 10 3/4"...guess that's a 11" logo then

 

[JTyson]

Metroamp has 'em. any size ever made (as BD said)

 

[Rampage]

Thanks for all the input guys.

I think I may end up buying from Metro.

goldwing68nv: I really appreciate you going through the trouble to measure it for me. I'll be going with the 11 incher (that's what she said ).

 

[goldwing68nv]

Rampage...if it makes HER happy,then it's gotta be good enough for YOU

 

[Marshall Law]

9 inch for the jmp, 11 inch on the jcm 800's although that was close to transtion year so maybe ?

 

[goldwing68nv]

guess anything's possible,especially so close to the 1981 transition year ...here's a pic of my 1980 JMP 2203 next to a 1983 JCM800 2204...looks like identical size MARSHALL logos.

 

[Marshall Law]

guess anything's possible,especially so close to the 1981 transition year ...here's a pic of my 1980 JMP 2203 next to a 1983 JCM800 2204...looks like identical size MARSHALL logos.

your JMP is definitely an 11 inch?
if you look At my sig pic below,the 81 jcm 800 has a 9 inch on it that was put on because I ordered the wrong size 15 years ago, and we just made it work, you can see how the ALL is going up at an angle.
the head below it is a 79 it has the 9 inch logo, and the head below that is a 77, I have since put a 9 inch on that one

 

[ericsabbath]

I think mine has a 9"
the headshell is wrong, though
it was actually a combo