
blackba
Well-known member
I don't like Relics, if I want a new guitar I buy a new guitar. If I want a beat up old guitar I buy a beat up old guitar. Buying a beat up looking new guitar just seems strange.
stratotone":2fjzc2c9 said:I have a pair of sneakers that are 10 years old, beat to hell, feel great. But I'd never pay 2x the new rate for worn out shoes, won't do that for guitars either. In my opinion, the reason why most 'real' relics sound so good is because they have been played a lot. I think the wear is secondary, except for instruments that may have had a real thick coat of finish and the finish has worn away. Remember that most guitars that get factory relic'd are high end instruments - you don't see too many relic mexican strats. I would bet that the guitars were kick ass BEFORE they got beat up too, unless it's something that you personally dig and can feel like rolled fingerboard edges or removal of lacquer on the neck.
Saw a show years ago about why old acoustic instruments sound better than new ones, was mainly focused on the changes at the molecular level the constant vibrations from being played did to the instrument. They even had a gizmo that vibrated acoustic instruments at different frequencies and then had pro players check them out vs new instruments - they picked the 'vibrated' ones every time.
My favorite relic story is the kid who took lessons from me 10 years ago - dad bought him a nice mexi strat new. Brought it to lessons a few weeks later, all relic'd up. He had taken a freaking hammer to it and hit the body all over - it looked like the surface of the moon. He also had to have his guitar reassembled and set up because he took the body off and dragged it behind his bike on a gravel road to also create a relic vibe. Didn't quite work.
Digital Jams":17luji5n said:Ratter stripped his EJ for about $10 and some messy work, no thanks on the $1000 fender mojoI agree about the guitar more than likely sounding great before the freon and files and how does one use tools to create years of hands on with a guitar?
Digital Jams":19op6xqv said:stratotone":19op6xqv said:I have a pair of sneakers that are 10 years old, beat to hell, feel great. But I'd never pay 2x the new rate for worn out shoes, won't do that for guitars either. In my opinion, the reason why most 'real' relics sound so good is because they have been played a lot. I think the wear is secondary, except for instruments that may have had a real thick coat of finish and the finish has worn away. Remember that most guitars that get factory relic'd are high end instruments - you don't see too many relic mexican strats. I would bet that the guitars were kick ass BEFORE they got beat up too, unless it's something that you personally dig and can feel like rolled fingerboard edges or removal of lacquer on the neck.
Saw a show years ago about why old acoustic instruments sound better than new ones, was mainly focused on the changes at the molecular level the constant vibrations from being played did to the instrument. They even had a gizmo that vibrated acoustic instruments at different frequencies and then had pro players check them out vs new instruments - they picked the 'vibrated' ones every time.
My favorite relic story is the kid who took lessons from me 10 years ago - dad bought him a nice mexi strat new. Brought it to lessons a few weeks later, all relic'd up. He had taken a freaking hammer to it and hit the body all over - it looked like the surface of the moon. He also had to have his guitar reassembled and set up because he took the body off and dragged it behind his bike on a gravel road to also create a relic vibe. Didn't quite work.
Ratter stripped his EJ for about $10 and some messy work, no thanks on the $1000 fender mojoI agree about the guitar more than likely sounding great before the freon and files and how does one use tools to create years of hands on with a guitar?
ratter":guke474s said:Big difference though between just stripping a neck and doing an authentic aging job. Not that most aging jobs are authentic, but you see where I'm going with this...
PeteLaramee":3hcx6mqj said:I voted "gay" because I prefer a guitar that has been beat up for real instead of pained to look that way.
Meh on the mojo Idea.... I just like the looks of it and the cool thing about it is that you dont have to baby it!!amiller":3ehris80 said:Yeah, I don't get the Relic thing. I know it's supposed to be cool and give the guitar the "played" mojo. To me, it's not any kind of real mojo...just BS.![]()
![]()
stratotone":1sry5yy8 said:ratter":1sry5yy8 said:Big difference though between just stripping a neck and doing an authentic aging job. Not that most aging jobs are authentic, but you see where I'm going with this...
If someone was into the aged look though, after you strip the fingerboard especially - just let it grunge up and you'll get the 'vintage vibe' happening pretty quickly. I noticed too on my burst EJ that the finish is starting to get 'dull' in places where I rest my arm when I play - probably due to how thin the nitro finish is I guess. I would wager within 5 years that guitar is going to be 'prematurely aged' which if it's done by playing IMHO is better to me than having some guy go at the finish with freon and then getting it hot to crack the lacquer, etc. But hey, different strokes for different folks. One thing that is nice about beating up your own guitars is each wear point has a story - I know where all my dents and dings came from, and it gives the guitar more history than one that had all the wear happen at once. Again, just my opinion.
Pete
stratotone":2ruy7bjg said:ratter":2ruy7bjg said:Big difference though between just stripping a neck and doing an authentic aging job. Not that most aging jobs are authentic, but you see where I'm going with this...
If someone was into the aged look though, after you strip the fingerboard especially - just let it grunge up and you'll get the 'vintage vibe' happening pretty quickly. I noticed too on my burst EJ that the finish is starting to get 'dull' in places where I rest my arm when I play - probably due to how thin the nitro finish is I guess. I would wager within 5 years that guitar is going to be 'prematurely aged' which if it's done by playing IMHO is better to me than having some guy go at the finish with freon and then getting it hot to crack the lacquer, etc. But hey, different strokes for different folks. One thing that is nice about beating up your own guitars is each wear point has a story - I know where all my dents and dings came from, and it gives the guitar more history than one that had all the wear happen at once. Again, just my opinion.
Pete