Rob Reiner & Wife Murdered In Their Home

He's fucking dead and his BS is still being spewed onto the public.

1765990146694.png
 
IMO The Presidents root message was that we should focus on family, friends and community sometimes before anything especially politics for such events to not happen.......



What's more important family and friends or politics?



For many on the left and WokeMericans such as those Pink Pussy Hat apologists for Communist/Socialist Transgender Terrorist at The Gear Page and the like sometimes what's really important loses priority unfortunately.


Nvm the immediate family how about the community and Hollywood in general, wasn't he at a party or something the day before with anyone who was anyone at Conan O'Briens house...... Everyone could see there was an issue.... It was clear he needed help or something yet no one in the community helped......


Now I'm not defending what this guy did to his own father and mother....... Or justifying any of it...... But no one in the community reached out or try to talk to the guy or help it seems....


Politics, talking shit on President Trump and hating and destroying America was and is still more important to WokeMericans I guess.....



Maybe WokeMericans need to take a step back, look in the mirror and reprioritize what's really important.....



And what's more important politics, hating and destroying America and making President Trump look bad....... Or what is going on with ones own family, friends and ones own life and the state of their happiness, health and well being :dunno:



It's a fucking tragedy no doubt and I don't think anyone takes glee or revels in something like this and IMO President Trump really just said it like it is in his own way.
 
Anyone who revels in the needless death of anyone, be it Kirk or Reiner or a kid at Brown or a Jew at Bondi, is vile and moronic.
I hear you but then, why do we have a military that kills all over the world and support that for people we have never met or will never meet?

It's NOT revelling in his death, it's revelling that he can't say any more BS and stress people out.
 
Speaking of low-life sub-humans... here's McDonald Trump's response to Rob Reiner and his wife's horrific death on his fucking Truth Social where he makes a joke about their murder with comments about TDS or Trump Derangement Syndrome. The only one who is deranged is Trump himself and his asshole followers who like to lick the sweet bunghole of their dear leader. :yes:

And I know that you aren't full of shit because of the way you railed against people goofing on Charlie Kirk.
 
I hear you but then, why do we have a military that kills all over the world and support that for people we have never met or will never meet?

Very good question. Why is the military killing people all over the world when there's not a declared war?

Never mind that a military action is NOT the same as a civilian murder so the the latter can't be used as an excuse for the former.

It's NOT revelling in his death, it's revelling that he can't say any more BS and stress people out.

A distinction without a difference. If I said the same about Charlie Kirk what would your reaction be?
 
Disagree. That's stooping to the level of overemotional hate and evil that the left exists on. If people don't start trying to lead by example, this tit for tat revenge politics culture will never stop.
You quoted my saying this:

Just gonna say this:

Righties were rightly-disgusted when peeps on the left said Charlie deserved it.

In fairness, it's gotta cut both ways.


Perhaps you misunderstood what I meant? All I was saying was that IMHO, in-fairness and also in keeping with decent moral standards, the right shouldn't be doing what the left did in September.

I sort of agree with you, however, Reiner's own rhetoric and publicised hatred at any opportunity had no rightful place in society either.
Agreed, but of course two wrongs don't make a right.

Reiner brought this bad press on himself as I don't believe dead people are automatically sainted. He said it so he is accountable regardless of being alive or not.
Agreed again.

Saying he deserved to die is a different matter 'though and a behaviour I've been against my entire life.

Agreed.

That and as mentioned Kirk was assassinated in public by a stranger with a rifle who clearly had a political motive.

That's a little different than what happened to the Reiners.
The method is irrelevant; saying that someone deserved to die because you don't like what he or she said is what my criticism came down to.

Anyone who revels in the needless death of anyone, be it Kirk or Reiner or a kid at Brown or a Jew at Bondi, is vile and moronic.
Amen. It simply comes down to this IMHO bro'.
 
Very good question. Why is the military killing people all over the world when there's not a declared war?

Never mind that a military action is NOT the same as a civilian murder so the the latter can't be used as an excuse for the former.



A distinction without a difference. If I said the same about Charlie Kirk what would your reaction be?
If you said this about Kirk I have no problem as you're not saying you're happy he's dead but you're happy he isn't spewing what you don't agree with using fairness and logic.

Military deaths? The death of a person is a death, so many countries have gun laws, many don't have capital punishment no matter the crime. People can't be hypocritical about killing certain people in another land that have never set foot in this country and committed a local crime and even if they did they wouldn't be killed as we see time and time again.

It's very hard to take people and governments serious when the hypocrisy is blatant. Here is an example of laws that are in place in many countries. A rapist breaks into my house at 3:00am and rapes my daughter and I kill him with my bare hands as I'm not allowed to own a gun, I go to jail for it. Yet, that same government gives me a gun and sends me to another country to kill people who have done nothing on our soil with 100% immunity.

You can't make this shit up.
 
He can barely string a sentence together in this vid and whatever he believed obviously didn't work out for him.

Too much money, entitlement, part of the out of touch hypocritical Hollywood crowd, plain stupidity, God complex etc...

Take your pick as I would hazard a guess and say it was one, or all, of the above.
 
He can barely string a sentence together in this vid and whatever he believed obviously didn't work out for him.

Too much money, entitlement, part of the out of touch hypocritical Hollywood crowd, plain stupidity, God complex etc...

Take your pick as I would hazard a guess and say it was one, or all, of the above.
It's called The Woke Mind Virus.
 
You quoted my saying this:

Just gonna say this:

Righties were rightly-disgusted when peeps on the left said Charlie deserved it.

In fairness, it's gotta cut both ways.


Perhaps you misunderstood what I meant? All I was saying was that IMHO, in-fairness and also in keeping with decent moral standards, the right shouldn't be doing what the left did in September.



The method is irrelevant; saying that someone deserved to die because you don't like what he or she said is what my criticism came down to.

I agree that two wrongs do not make a right. I agree that the 'right' should always take the high road and stay out of the 'left's' gutter (very broad and general statement there). So maybe I was confused by your choice of words, "cut both ways".

And I agree that no one deserves to die by the hands of someone who doesn't like what they say. But for example, if someone rapes and kills a child - then they should be hung by the closest tree as far as I'm concerned. And I get what you are saying about the irrelevancy of HOW they are killed (in our examples), but I feel an unstable son killing his parents for unknown reasons is not as egregious as assassinating someone in pubic.

In the end, I think we are saying the same thing.
 
Last edited:
The death of a person is a death.
While this statement is obviously self evident, you are using it to equate murder, disease, car accidents, wars, old age, etc. Obviously they're not all the same. Sure, they're all deaths but we treat them all different legally and we react to them different socially.
 
While this statement is obviously self evident, you are using it to equate murder, disease, car accidents, wars, old age, etc. Obviously they're not all the same. Sure, they're all deaths but we treat them all different legally and we react to them different socially.
Yes, I agree, however, a social construct doesn't make it right at its core...it is a convenience for most of a society.

I expect you would know this.
 
Back
Top