danburton":1qd4wknd said:Sounds about right, although full disclosure I only played the Runt at Guitar Center (own a Pink Taco).
True story - the GC folks hadnt heard of the Runt/Friedman before. Within about a minute of plugging it in, half the store came over to ask what sounded so good.
Red_Label":146u21uf said:danburton":146u21uf said:Sounds about right, although full disclosure I only played the Runt at Guitar Center (own a Pink Taco).
True story - the GC folks hadnt heard of the Runt/Friedman before. Within about a minute of plugging it in, half the store came over to ask what sounded so good.
Wow... I thought that at most GC workers are deaf, mindless, soulless robots who couldn't care less about great tone. At least that's the way the ones at the Vegas GC that I visit now and then always seem. I used to buy stuff there on my Vegas getaways, but I got tired of the mood there... so now when I bother to stop in, it's only to see if there's something that I haven't seen before and check it out (which I then order from Sweetwater or somewhere else).
Go with the 50shaps6":10uiorfa said:I've been debating between these two. Is it possible to get any sort of workable clean tone out of the PT-20? I (like many) would like an amp that can do a nice clean and also get nice and dirty.
My alternative would be to get a clean amp and maybe put a BE overdrive pedal in front of it. Thoughts on either option?
ur2funky":1sk6pc6f said:I used to have the Royalist. I really liked it. Not anywhere near the gain of the Friedmans though. That amp makes me want to play AC/DC all night long. I always wanted more gain out of it because it sounds very good. The Ironman attenuator isn't nearly as slick as the Friedman's master.
If you want cleans, forget the PT. It's about rockin'!!! You can clean it up, but where's the fun in that? lol The Runt has dedicated clean and mean.