
gbsmusic":ko2rdoub said:
Rick Lee":1hf5mtqm said:gbsmusic":1hf5mtqm said:
That sounds awesome, but is not what I'm looking for (this time).
Check out the D chord here at 1:44. It sounds like his Marshall is about to catch fire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwzXop5kLxE
That is THE tone I want. Everyone gushes about VH1 tones, but I swear the second and third albums are where it's at for me.
LP Freak":2ilymrcd said:Very odd observation on the Friedman mod you played. I'm not saying you're full of shit but I've had Dave mod numerous Marshalls and never had an issue where the amp didn't hold together at band volumes with any of them.
AndyK":1752656m said:Here is my former Friedman modded Marshall JCM800 1987. Sounded really cool, probably should have kept it! Just the BE mod plus saturation (which I never used).
I think I had that one, was passed around here a bit? If it was I was unimpressed, OK sounding but didn't wow me. It was an 800 nmv, same features. But every donor amp is gonna sound different, so take that into consideration....AndyK":2e1cn0l7 said:Here is my former Friedman modded Marshall JCM800 1987. Sounded really cool, probably should have kept it! Just the BE mod plus saturation (which I never used).
Racerxrated":211yjg21 said:I think I had that one, was passed around here a bit? If it was I was unimpressed, OK sounding but didn't wow me. It was an 800 nmv, same features. But every donor amp is gonna sound different, so take that into consideration....AndyK":211yjg21 said:Here is my former Friedman modded Marshall JCM800 1987. Sounded really cool, probably should have kept it! Just the BE mod plus saturation (which I never used).
glpg80":3v7hhpyh said:LP Freak":3v7hhpyh said:Very odd observation on the Friedman mod you played. I'm not saying you're full of shit but I've had Dave mod numerous Marshalls and never had an issue where the amp didn't hold together at band volumes with any of them.
Indeed. You could say bad things about all amplifiers in reality though. Guitar players know no end. Years ago there was a weird mids discussion for all of Splawn's amplifiers which I'm sure you remember. Some of Splawn's earlier series of quick rod models had an ice-pick to the forehead problem with certain speakers, this could go on and on. It's all a matter of perspective, preferences, and certainly speakers being played through at the time.
But I can guarantee although Friedman does excellent work, the Friedman KS I played was falling apart and was not able to keep the same dynamics at slightly above band volumes. Other amplifiers in the studio had no problem with similar loudness settings through the same cabinet. All amps were very well maintained. I was surprised and overall disappointed. On raw recordings though, it sounded just fine. It's an honest observation based on playing one first hand. I'd consider Friedman's work for studio use
only. YMMV.
evhfan":18pxuydl said:The new Splawn B+ has cured my Friedman gas...
Yes agreed. The mod 5 you sold me was better IMO. That BE mod certainly wasn't a bad amp, just not that different than a pedal/800 tone. Which is a tried and true combination.AndyK":uhno13dp said:Racerxrated":uhno13dp said:I think I had that one, was passed around here a bit? If it was I was unimpressed, OK sounding but didn't wow me. It was an 800 nmv, same features. But every donor amp is gonna sound different, so take that into consideration....AndyK":uhno13dp said:Here is my former Friedman modded Marshall JCM800 1987. Sounded really cool, probably should have kept it! Just the BE mod plus saturation (which I never used).
Yup, OK, but unimpressive was the way I remember it. Too much all or nothing gain for me. I like my 1987 w/LarMar much better.