
Devilinside
Active member
I paid $1300 for my mint 2011 including shipping. That does not sound like a great deal
Yep - I think that is the smartest thing to do. That or find a used 2012. Footswitchable gears seems like a great addition.sixstringking713":1mne8cah said:thanks for the responses. The one salesman was a prick too so whatever"you like the amp, why dont you just buy it. There's no difference to a new one"
I emailed scott and he said the new ones are coming with a 4 pedal footswitch where you can select the modes
Looks like i'm going to place an order for a 2012 quickrod in the next coming months![]()
Ya these new 2012's are the real deal...I have played them all and these new ones are killer for sure.....MORIANO":3v5plxs3 said:I own the first 2012 PROTO Lo Sag QuickRod "Destroyer" B+ Variac style BEAST!
As well as the 2012 newest version update of the QuickRod. Has more gain, more saturation and a slight change in the mid EQ. I have a 2012 Nitro as well and end result is Cameron who?
![]()
racerevlon":8lmgrzke said:What are the changes to the Nitro beyond the OT? I have a later Nitro with loop volume, but not 2010 or later. Also, the loop volume may have been a retrofit...
yup....this for sure!splawner":a5eheewn said:Heck for a couple bucks more you can get the latest and greatest 2012 model.....![]()
100% correct....I love the Spawn because it does not sound like any amp i have ever playedscriptphase":go6oj14o said:2011 Quick Rod owner here.
I'm not sure what to make of the periodic updates that have happened to the Splawn line the past few years. Scott Splawn reminds me of another great amp builder, Ben Fargen...a guy that knows his stuff, builds a great product, has superb customer service, and was smart enough to realize that one of his biggest sources of competition was his old products now being sold used.
The signature sound Splawn became known for was the amps were dry, tight, they had high-gain with clarity, and a unique midrange that cut through. Adding a 4th pre for a better clean channel was an across-the-board improvement. So was the loop volume and 4-button footswitch to change gears (1st/2nd or 2nd/3rd).
But adding saturation, decreasing the mids, and this lo-sag/softened low end stuff? These changes weren't mentioned as improvements necessarily, but something Scott did based on listening to customer feedback. That's just good business sense...you listen to your customers' need and update your products to keep them fresh...but at what point are these changes watering down the signature tone that sets you apart from all the other hot-rodded amp companies? I bought a Splawn because I wanted an amp that didn't sound like anything else.
stompboxfreak72":19kimjxp said:racerevlon":19kimjxp said:What are the changes to the Nitro beyond the OT? I have a later Nitro with loop volume, but not 2010 or later. Also, the loop volume may have been a retrofit...
I have a 2008 Nitro and a 2012 Nitro. The 2012 has a slightly better volume taper ( not great, just better) and is definetly more saturated. The resonance/presence controls have much more of an effect than on my 2008. At band volumes I'd say the changes are subtle though. I certainly prefer the 2012 but at a gig I could plug into either and be completely happy.
I also owned a 2009 QR. I did not get along with that amp. It was very dry to my ears and I always ended up playing my Nitro instead. I have a 2012 QR on order with the low voltage option for more sag. It should arrive in a few weeks.
For $1950 you can have the latest updates to the QR. i would never pay $1600 for a 2009.
scriptphase":3h0su6hg said:2011 Quick Rod owner here.
I'm not sure what to make of the periodic updates that have happened to the Splawn line the past few years. Scott Splawn reminds me of another great amp builder, Ben Fargen...a guy that knows his stuff, builds a great product, has superb customer service, and was smart enough to realize that one of his biggest sources of competition was his old products now being sold used.
The signature sound Splawn became known for was the amps were dry, tight, they had high-gain with clarity, and a unique midrange that cut through. Adding a 4th pre for a better clean channel was an across-the-board improvement. So was the loop volume and 4-button footswitch to change gears (1st/2nd or 2nd/3rd).
But adding saturation, decreasing the mids, and this lo-sag/softened low end stuff? These changes weren't mentioned as improvements necessarily, but something Scott did based on listening to customer feedback. That's just good business sense...you listen to your customers' need and update your products to keep them fresh...but at what point are these changes watering down the signature tone that sets you apart from all the other hot-rodded amp companies? I bought a Splawn because I wanted an amp that didn't sound like anything else.
sixstringking713":7msb4nvt said:stompboxfreak72":7msb4nvt said:racerevlon":7msb4nvt said:What are the changes to the Nitro beyond the OT? I have a later Nitro with loop volume, but not 2010 or later. Also, the loop volume may have been a retrofit...
I have a 2008 Nitro and a 2012 Nitro. The 2012 has a slightly better volume taper ( not great, just better) and is definetly more saturated. The resonance/presence controls have much more of an effect than on my 2008. At band volumes I'd say the changes are subtle though. I certainly prefer the 2012 but at a gig I could plug into either and be completely happy.
I also owned a 2009 QR. I did not get along with that amp. It was very dry to my ears and I always ended up playing my Nitro instead. I have a 2012 QR on order with the low voltage option for more sag. It should arrive in a few weeks.
For $1950 you can have the latest updates to the QR. i would never pay $1600 for a 2009.
what do you mean by this "low voltage option for more sag"? does this cost more money? Does it emulate a variac?
quinnethan":13tmw70f said:I have played various QR stages and all of them sounded like a Splawn. Sort of playing a Bogner always sounds like a Bogner. I think the tone sets them apart from the other Marshall vein amps, but also the price. There are some in the Splawn range but most talked about as comparable tone wise is not comparable price wise. For some "modded Marshalls" you could buy a custom Quickrod, a custom Splawn cab, and a used pro mod Charvel and nobody is going to tell the difference when playing Lay it Down.
My first Splawn was a PRO MOD, killer tone! These 2012 models I own are incredible "Splawn" tone thru and thru, NOTHING from the 2012 amp line could use the phrase "water downed". Is just pure false, but everyone can say what they want.scriptphase":14qgj617 said:2011 Quick Rod owner here.
I'm not sure what to make of the periodic updates that have happened to the Splawn line the past few years. Scott Splawn reminds me of another great amp builder, Ben Fargen...a guy that knows his stuff, builds a great product, has superb customer service, and was smart enough to realize that one of his biggest sources of competition was his old products now being sold used.
The signature sound Splawn became known for was the amps were dry, tight, they had high-gain with clarity, and a unique midrange that cut through. Adding a 4th pre for a better clean channel was an across-the-board improvement. So was the loop volume and 4-button footswitch to change gears (1st/2nd or 2nd/3rd).
But adding saturation, decreasing the mids, and this lo-sag/softened low end stuff? These changes weren't mentioned as improvements necessarily, but something Scott did based on listening to customer feedback. That's just good business sense...you listen to your customers' need and update your products to keep them fresh...but at what point are these changes watering down the signature tone that sets you apart from all the other hot-rodded amp companies? I bought a Splawn because I wanted an amp that didn't sound like anything else.