
Love how heavy & aggressive A is but B is much clearer & I think it would cut better in a mix.. Are these raw or did you process the signals at all?
Let me rephrase.. In a full mix with vocals.that is a mix?
Raw, Amps recorded on low volume. It was late. There's a bit Tape Presence Simulation and a Maximizer on the DAW-Master.Love how heavy & aggressive A is but B is much clearer & I think it would cut better in a mix.. Are these raw or did you process the signals at all?
Thanks.First I listened on my phone. Then my laptop. Then thru Yamaha HS8s.
Difference is negligible.
Honestly, no one will hear a difference between those 2 clips in a normal listening situation.
Being persnickety, maybe less mids and more high end energy on A, maybe a bit smoother/thicker on B.
The difference is so minimal, no one would notice if this wasn't presented as an A vs B scenario.
If I had to choose, I'd say B, due to the very slightly fuller sound.
Great job if your goal was to dial them in as close as possible. Success.
Thanks.A for me. B sounds a little generic to my ear. Really like these riffs
Interesting.boy that's close. 2nd one is a tad fatter/beafier, 1st one a tad thinner/clearer.
I agree with @LPMojoGL, wouldn't have even noticed if not presented as A/B.
Ps.: i tried 3 different Headphones and funnily the cheapest inears ones showed the most differences between A & B
They are level matched. If i hadn't it were the other way around. It's a matter of 0.6 to 0.9db.Before I read any of the comments I will say that the second (B) clip was either not cutting as well but more likely the levels were not matched as I got a slight volume drop for lack of a better way of saying it. I'm not familiar with these two amps to know which was which. If the Marshall was unmodded, I'd say the SLO was first (A).