
Markedman
Well-known member
I play aggressively for the most part being the main lead player in the band so I must tune between songs no matter what the fuck guitar I'm using. I use headless guitars mainly but I bought a 20012 LP and I tried bone, brass and tusq xl and the tusq was my favorite. The brass was too much. Too much everything. If you like bright, clear, long sustain, brass is what you want. The nut absolutely affects the whole tone of a guitar, not just when playing open strings. It was so noticeable when I changed from bone to brass, the center of the sound emitting from the unplugged guitar went from the bridge area to the upper mid neck area and was twice the acoustic volume. The Callaham bridge replacement made less of an impact on sound compared to replacing the nut.
Bone and the original nut were dull in comparison to brass, but the tusq was warm, clear and supposedly 5X slipperier than bone for a more stable tuning. The sound was just, right, what I wanted for me. YMMV.
IMO, that tuning stabilizer gizmo is as fugly as a clip-on tuner. Now, get off my lawn! Rant rant!!
Bone and the original nut were dull in comparison to brass, but the tusq was warm, clear and supposedly 5X slipperier than bone for a more stable tuning. The sound was just, right, what I wanted for me. YMMV.
IMO, that tuning stabilizer gizmo is as fugly as a clip-on tuner. Now, get off my lawn! Rant rant!!