Suhr guitars quality

[mooncobra]

I have some pretty nice guitars, a bad ass Les Paul, a beat up but very playable and great sounding PRS McCarty, and a Suhr Modern. I usually play for at least 2 hours when I sit down to play. I usually start out with the PRS or Les Paul. After a while I change over to the Suhr Modern. The difference between the Suhr and the other two is pretty big. The playability is absolutely incredible, the neck is slick and fast, the action could not be better, the sound is so so good, and the pickups are great! Suhr makes some truly amazing instruments. The Suhr Modern in to the Gower Rockmonster is an amazing combo. I can dial in the best high gain tones ever!

Any of you guys experience the same thing when playing another of your guitars, then grabbing your Suhr, and you think to yourself, "unbelievable, this thing is just amazing." And the quality is even more noticeable because you just played another guitar before it.

 

[WizardSouth-JP]

yup
my Suhr Custom T sent many a guitar back to where I bought it or to ebay

 

[yngzaklynch]

Love mine so much i ordered a second. Enuff said

 

[El Mariachi]

YUP!!! Bought one... Now I have three!

 

[Tone Zone]

I know exactly what you are talking about. I have three different guitars that I really enjoy playing (LP Trad, EBMM Reflex, PRS S2 Cu24). But, when I switch off to one of my Suhr Moderns, it's like...."HOT DAMN!...this plays so niiiiice and sounds amazing!" Which explains why I have four of them. Never have I played a guitar that felt so right in my hands and sounds equally as good than a Suhr Modern. Suhr Modern owner for life!

 

[ubermetaldood]

Sounds to me it's more of the guitar design rather than the brand. First of all, almost any Ibanez, Jackson, Suhr Modern or strat will have better playability than a Les Paul or PRS. I have owned a number of incredible guitars such as Tom Anderson, G&L, Fender custom shop, Jackson USA, ESP Japan, Charvel custom shop, Ibanez JCraft, etc... I'm going to be honest with you here and say that I haven't played a Suhr with better playability than a G&L Legacy. However, the fact that you can buy them with a variety of options and SS frets and a selection of really great Suhr pickups (if you have the cold, hard cash to afford one) is something that makes Suhr really great guitars.

There is no doubt that they are constructed with precision craftsmanship and high-quality parts. I particularly like the Gotoh 2-point trems they use. The tuning stability and playability of any of their models is fantastic. I like Suhr pickups more than anything Seymour Duncan offers, so I think they have quite a lot to offer including a nice little selection of boutique amps.

Having said that, I have withdrawn from all the high-end boutique builders in favor of Warmoth which I think matches the quality of any top name; and it doesn't break the bank. The main difference being the resell value, but I'm not into buying guitars that I will sell these days so it makes no difference to me. As long Carvins, Warmoths, and G&L's are affordable, I won't be buying any other bolt-ons unless I somehow strike it rich.

 

[legend71]

I have a couple Suhr Custom Classic starts that absolutely rule. I love them. I wanna buy a modern but I just love those guitars so much I don't wanna ruin the mojo of playing them ha.

 

[WizardSouth-JP]

I have had a few Moderns, I prefer the T and the Classic as the modern is a little smaller body. They're super cool guitars but I gravitate towards more traditional shapes. I have a Classic on order now, in black mini sparkle...should be awesome when it's done.

 

[Metlupass2]

I remember the days when I dreamed of owning a Suhr or Tom Anderson.

 

[dfrattaroli]

I feel the same exact way every time I pull out one of my Moderns. For me, there is nothing like them. They just fit me. Plus, I've had mine since 2008 and 2009 and I never have to touch the truss rods. I live in NY so the seasons definitely change.

 

[thiswaythatway]

Sounds to me it's more of the guitar design rather than the brand. First of all, almost any Ibanez, Jackson, Suhr Modern or strat will have better playability than a Les Paul or PRS. I have owned a number of incredible guitars such as Tom Anderson, G&L, Fender custom shop, Jackson USA, ESP Japan, Charvel custom shop, Ibanez JCraft, etc... I'm going to be honest with you here and say that I haven't played a Suhr with better playability than a G&L Legacy. However, the fact that you can buy them with a variety of options and SS frets and a selection of really great Suhr pickups (if you have the cold, hard cash to afford one) is something that makes Suhr really great guitars.

There is no doubt that they are constructed with precision craftsmanship and high-quality parts. I particularly like the Gotoh 2-point trems they use. The tuning stability and playability of any of their models is fantastic. I like Suhr pickups more than anything Seymour Duncan offers, so I think they have quite a lot to offer including a nice little selection of boutique amps.

Having said that, I have withdrawn from all the high-end boutique builders in favor of Warmoth which I think matches the quality of any top name; and it doesn't break the bank. The main difference being the resell value, but I'm not into buying guitars that I will sell these days so it makes no difference to me. As long Carvins, Warmoths, and G&L's are affordable, I won't be buying any other bolt-ons unless I somehow strike it rich.

Not really. I have a PRS DGT right now that I wouldn't trade for any Suhr under 2.5K. After that price I'd just make the trade then sell the Suhr. But after I get done tweaking a guitar to my tastes I can feel about the same on guitars from several brands, given I kinda like the guitar in the first place. But, if someone is at home on a Les Paul you give them a Suhr modern and it's like drinking Orange Juice after you just brushed your teeth, not pretty. If someone doesn't like a flat, sleek bolt on's, then they won't like a Suhr. And I for one can't stand wide thin necks like you find on a lot of Ibanez guitars.

And you included Fender in brands you think will play better than a PRS or Gibson! I have grabbed a lot of Fenders off the wall at local stores and put them right back, no thanks! If you like the feel of Bolt on's then more power to you, but if you don't then it doesn't matter if you set the strings to basically rest on the frets, still won't matter.

 

[gibson5413]

Sounds to me it's more of the guitar design rather than the brand. First of all, almost any Ibanez, Jackson, Suhr Modern or strat will have better playability than a Les Paul or PRS. I have owned a number of incredible guitars such as Tom Anderson, G&L, Fender custom shop, Jackson USA, ESP Japan, Charvel custom shop, Ibanez JCraft, etc... I'm going to be honest with you here and say that I haven't played a Suhr with better playability than a G&L Legacy. However, the fact that you can buy them with a variety of options and SS frets and a selection of really great Suhr pickups (if you have the cold, hard cash to afford one) is something that makes Suhr really great guitars.

There is no doubt that they are constructed with precision craftsmanship and high-quality parts. I particularly like the Gotoh 2-point trems they use. The tuning stability and playability of any of their models is fantastic. I like Suhr pickups more than anything Seymour Duncan offers, so I think they have quite a lot to offer including a nice little selection of boutique amps.

Having said that, I have withdrawn from all the high-end boutique builders in favor of Warmoth which I think matches the quality of any top name; and it doesn't break the bank. The main difference being the resell value, but I'm not into buying guitars that I will sell these days so it makes no difference to me. As long Carvins, Warmoths, and G&L's are affordable, I won't be buying any other bolt-ons unless I somehow strike it rich.

Not really. I have a PRS DGT right now that I wouldn't trade for any Suhr under 2.5K. After that price I'd just make the trade then sell the Suhr. But after I get done tweaking a guitar to my tastes I can feel about the same on guitars from several brands, given I kinda like the guitar in the first place. But, if someone is at home on a Les Paul you give them a Suhr modern and it's like drinking Orange Juice after you just brushed your teeth, not pretty. If someone doesn't like a flat, sleek bolt on's, then they won't like a Suhr. And I for one can't stand wide thin necks like you find on a lot of Ibanez guitars.

And you included Fender in brands you think will play better than a PRS or Gibson! I have grabbed a lot of Fenders off the wall at local stores and put them right back, no thanks! If you like the feel of Bolt on's then more power to you, but if you don't then it doesn't matter if you set the strings to basically rest on the frets, still won't matter.

I totally feel the same way as you where I bolded. I can make just about anything work.

 

[ubermetaldood]

Sounds to me it's more of the guitar design rather than the brand. First of all, almost any Ibanez, Jackson, Suhr Modern or strat will have better playability than a Les Paul or PRS. I have owned a number of incredible guitars such as Tom Anderson, G&L, Fender custom shop, Jackson USA, ESP Japan, Charvel custom shop, Ibanez JCraft, etc... I'm going to be honest with you here and say that I haven't played a Suhr with better playability than a G&L Legacy. However, the fact that you can buy them with a variety of options and SS frets and a selection of really great Suhr pickups (if you have the cold, hard cash to afford one) is something that makes Suhr really great guitars.

There is no doubt that they are constructed with precision craftsmanship and high-quality parts. I particularly like the Gotoh 2-point trems they use. The tuning stability and playability of any of their models is fantastic. I like Suhr pickups more than anything Seymour Duncan offers, so I think they have quite a lot to offer including a nice little selection of boutique amps.

Having said that, I have withdrawn from all the high-end boutique builders in favor of Warmoth which I think matches the quality of any top name; and it doesn't break the bank. The main difference being the resell value, but I'm not into buying guitars that I will sell these days so it makes no difference to me. As long Carvins, Warmoths, and G&L's are affordable, I won't be buying any other bolt-ons unless I somehow strike it rich.

Not really. I have a PRS DGT right now that I wouldn't trade for any Suhr under 2.5K. After that price I'd just make the trade then sell the Suhr. But after I get done tweaking a guitar to my tastes I can feel about the same on guitars from several brands, given I kinda like the guitar in the first place. But, if someone is at home on a Les Paul you give them a Suhr modern and it's like drinking Orange Juice after you just brushed your teeth, not pretty. If someone doesn't like a flat, sleek bolt on's, then they won't like a Suhr. And I for one can't stand wide thin necks like you find on a lot of Ibanez guitars.

And you included Fender in brands you think will play better than a PRS or Gibson! I have grabbed a lot of Fenders off the wall at local stores and put them right back, no thanks! If you like the feel of Bolt on's then more power to you, but if you don't then it doesn't matter if you set the strings to basically rest on the frets, still won't matter.

My statement was obviously not intended to challenge the playability of PRS or Gibson type guitars because it's common sense that a guitar which is setup right and fits most comfortably in the player's hands has the best playability. It is generally accepted, however, that shredder guitars and strats have more playability. Therefore, there's no need to contend with my statement. It seems to me you were just looking for an argument and picked a poor point to stand on. Carry on...

 

[cardinal]

Suhr guitars are top notch, but I agree it's probably more that the Modern design is just more suited to your preferences than the other guitars.

 

[Slaytallica]

Yup. Not only is it a great instrument they have great QC. Had an issue with my locking nut and spoke to them. Told me to send it right in and they covered it no cost to me. Great Great Company all around.

 

[ibenhad]

Great guitars and I love mine but they just feel a bit sterile. Not like a parker fly sterile but just meh.... My old Jackson SL2H Soloist was a much better guitar than my Suhr. Just something about it to me feels too nice maybe? I have an Ibanez RG920qmz that looks as nice and plays almost as good as my Suhr and is only $900 or so new. Just saying strat guys are strat guys nothing has the sound of a Les Paul and setup right they suhr can shred too if that's your bag. Look at Randy, Zakk, Gary Moore, Adrian Vandenburg, Vivian Campbell and sooo many more. As to the OP's question I never feel like I play on the Suhr any better/worse or that it just has something better than any other guitar I own. All IMHO of course.

 

[thiswaythatway]

Sounds to me it's more of the guitar design rather than the brand. First of all, almost any Ibanez, Jackson, Suhr Modern or strat will have better playability than a Les Paul or PRS. I have owned a number of incredible guitars such as Tom Anderson, G&L, Fender custom shop, Jackson USA, ESP Japan, Charvel custom shop, Ibanez JCraft, etc... I'm going to be honest with you here and say that I haven't played a Suhr with better playability than a G&L Legacy. However, the fact that you can buy them with a variety of options and SS frets and a selection of really great Suhr pickups (if you have the cold, hard cash to afford one) is something that makes Suhr really great guitars.

There is no doubt that they are constructed with precision craftsmanship and high-quality parts. I particularly like the Gotoh 2-point trems they use. The tuning stability and playability of any of their models is fantastic. I like Suhr pickups more than anything Seymour Duncan offers, so I think they have quite a lot to offer including a nice little selection of boutique amps.

Having said that, I have withdrawn from all the high-end boutique builders in favor of Warmoth which I think matches the quality of any top name; and it doesn't break the bank. The main difference being the resell value, but I'm not into buying guitars that I will sell these days so it makes no difference to me. As long Carvins, Warmoths, and G&L's are affordable, I won't be buying any other bolt-ons unless I somehow strike it rich.

Not really. I have a PRS DGT right now that I wouldn't trade for any Suhr under 2.5K. After that price I'd just make the trade then sell the Suhr. But after I get done tweaking a guitar to my tastes I can feel about the same on guitars from several brands, given I kinda like the guitar in the first place. But, if someone is at home on a Les Paul you give them a Suhr modern and it's like drinking Orange Juice after you just brushed your teeth, not pretty. If someone doesn't like a flat, sleek bolt on's, then they won't like a Suhr. And I for one can't stand wide thin necks like you find on a lot of Ibanez guitars.

And you included Fender in brands you think will play better than a PRS or Gibson! I have grabbed a lot of Fenders off the wall at local stores and put them right back, no thanks! If you like the feel of Bolt on's then more power to you, but if you don't then it doesn't matter if you set the strings to basically rest on the frets, still won't matter.

My statement was obviously not intended to challenge the playability of PRS or Gibson type guitars because it's common sense that a guitar which is setup right and fits most comfortably in the player's hands has the best playability. It is generally accepted, however, that shredder guitars and strats have more playability. Therefore, there's no need to contend with my statement. It seems to me you were just looking for an argument and picked a poor point to stand on. Carry on...

Oh geez, are we back on The Gear Page here without me knowing it?