Trump reaches yet another disgusting new low

J

JDs Couch

Well-known member
1763685255016.jpeg
 
When Trump was asked about the release of the Epstein files, he called one reporter "piggy" and said another was "being insubordinate."When Trump saw a video calling on the military to follow the constitution, he called for the death of the Democrats who made the video. He's a tyrant.
 
(This is the President of the United States threatening to kill members of Congress because they told our members of the military to refuse illegal orders from any commanding officers.)
 
Awwwwww…
Poor JDs crotch
Loosing on all fronts and there’s not a dam thing you can do about it.

It makes me all warm and fuzzy inside just to laugh my ass off at one tsunami of stupid after the next coming from your 4 braincells ..

But take heart, tomorrow there will be ample opportunities for you to wash, rinse and repeat and prove it all over again. Might as well be all you can be

🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
When Trump was asked about the release of the Epstein files, he called one reporter "piggy" and said another was "being insubordinate."When Trump saw a video calling on the military to follow the constitution, he called for the death of the Democrats who made the video. He's a tyrant.
(This is the President of the United States threatening to kill members of Congress because they told our members of the military to refuse illegal orders from any commanding officers.)
1763728975237.png
 
The section of Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice dealing with failing to obey orders states that members can only be sanctioned for disobeying lawful orders. And servicemembers are obligated to not follow orders that are “manifestly unlawful.”
 
It's called sedition:

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-2387/

18 U.S.C. § 2387 pertains to activities affecting the armed forces generally. It states that anyone who intends to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States can face penalties, including fines or imprisonment for up to ten years, and may be ineligible for employment by the United States for five years following conviction. The section also consolidates previous legal provisions and extends coverage to include the Coast Guard Reserve.

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

(1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or
(2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States--
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel.

So lets review:

1. Do we have the intent to influence loyalty/morale military/naval forces, cause insubordination, or interfere with? Yep

2. Do we have people advising or urging military members to be insubordinate, disloyal, mutinous, or refuse duty? Yep.

Charge them all. I'd also look at treason as well.

Especially since no "wrongful/illegal orders" were ever issued.

They are trying to stir the pot... but what they did is called sedition.
 
You're possibly the biggest retard around here. Just because you don't like the order doesn't make it unlawful.
Maybe stick to what your good at like fucking sheep
Who said anything about not liking orders? The whole subject is not following unlawful orders. Which is their obligation by law.
 
Back
Top