Trump's appointments

[VonBonfire]

What do you think of the Irish? Do you tolerate their culture?

Do you think he could beat a pygmy in a game of basketball?

 

[Geo]

Do you think he could beat a pygmy in a game of basketball?

I bet he doesn't even have a handtruck in his living room.

 

[Thumbpicker]

What do you think of the Irish? Do you tolerate their culture?

Is the culture western? Yes: OK, No: More information required.

You do realise that the Union Jack in the corner of our flag is because we originally came from Ireland, Scotland, England and Wales. Back then the whole of Ireland was in the UK.

 

[Geo]

Do you think he could beat a pygmy in a game of basketball?

 

[Geo]

Is the culture western? Yes: OK, No: More information required.

Well it's European, but they do have less of a melanin content in their skin.

I would guess you are cool with it.

 

[VonBonfire]

I bet he doesn't even have a handtruck in his living room.

You can't beat him at a game of limbo, I can tell you that.

 

[Thumbpicker]

Well it's European, but they do have less of melanin content in their skin.

I would guess you are cool with it.

Nothing to do with melanin. However obviously European countries generally historically had Western cultures. The exception being say Turkey. Why did Constantinople get the works... that's nobody's business but the Turks.

 

[Geo]

Nothing to do with melanin. However obviously European countries generally historically had Western cultures. The exception being say Turkey. Why did Constantinople get the works... that's nobody's business but the Turks.

I get what you are sayin', the Turkish definitely have more melanin in their skin.

 

[Thumbpicker]

I get what you are sayin', the Turkish definitely have more melanin in their skin.

No Turkey was invaded by Muslims hence greater cultural differences.

 

[Floyd Eye]

5 U.S.C. § 3110, Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 C.F.R. § 2635, 18 U.S.C. § 208

In 1978, Congress passed HR 11003: “A bill to clarify the authority for employment of personnel in the White House Office and the Executive Residence,” which was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter.[7]
The law states, in part, that “the President is authorized to appoint and fix the pay of employees in the White House Office without regard to any other provision of law regulating the employment or compensation of persons in the Government service. Employees so appointed shall perform such official duties as the President may prescribe.”[8]
In a 1993 ruling, Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suggested the anti-nepotism statute might not apply to presidential appointments of White House personnel. In his decision in Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton, Silberman wrote,

[TR]
[td]“[/td]
[/TR]

 

[tallcoolone]

All Trump's appointments do have something in common. Anyone want to venture a guess?

Hopefully they are all 100% on board with his administration. That was his problem the last time.

 

[tallcoolone]

I don't hate blacks. I don't necessarily want to share my country with them though.

Damn--puttin it right out there, eh?

 

[TheBiggestJerk]

In 1978, Congress passed HR 11003: “A bill to clarify the authority for employment of personnel in the White House Office and the Executive Residence,” which was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter.[7]
The law states, in part, that “the President is authorized to appoint and fix the pay of employees in the White House Office without regard to any other provision of law regulating the employment or compensation of persons in the Government service. Employees so appointed shall perform such official duties as the President may prescribe.”[8]
In a 1993 ruling, Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suggested the anti-nepotism statute might not apply to presidential appointments of White House personnel. In his decision in Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton, Silberman wrote,


[TR]
[td]“[/td]
[/TR]

But still applied.

 

[Floyd Eye]

But still applied.

Well there are a bunch of other decisions and legal bullshit that have muddied the waters greatly. Going back to Clinton appointing Killary as the healthcare bitch. Trump is not the first president to do it and he won't be the last.

 

[TheBiggestJerk]

Well there are a bunch of other decisions and legal bullshit that have muddied the waters greatly. Going back to Clinton appointing Killary as the healthcare bitch. Trump is not the first president to do it and he won't be the last.

It’s my opinion that SCOTUS is compromised- bought and paid for.
Ask the black one.

 

[Thumbpicker]

In 1978, Congress passed HR 11003: “A bill to clarify the authority for employment of personnel in the White House Office and the Executive Residence,” which was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter.[7]
The law states, in part, that “the President is authorized to appoint and fix the pay of employees in the White House Office without regard to any other provision of law regulating the employment or compensation of persons in the Government service. Employees so appointed shall perform such official duties as the President may prescribe.”[8]
In a 1993 ruling, Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suggested the anti-nepotism statute might not apply to presidential appointments of White House personnel. In his decision in Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton, Silberman wrote,


[TR]
[td]“[/td]
[/TR]

So the institution of President allows institutionalised nepotism. Great.

 

[Thumbpicker]

Damn--puttin it right out there, eh?

Not really - how about concentrating on my first sentence and remembering I don't live in a country like the US that for historical reasons has a different demographic that way. I don't hate blacks.

 

[tallcoolone]

Not really - how about concentrating on my first sentence. I don't hate blacks.

As long as they are somewhere else, right?

 

[Thumbpicker]

As long as they are somewhere else, right?

Well remember they do actually come from somewhere else and migrate to the European lands of milk and honey for a reason. They could always create a successful African nation and fix where they came from. That isn't really happening is it.

 

[tallcoolone]

It’s my opinion that SCOTUS is compromised- bought and paid for.
Ask the black one.

Her?