Why Americans are dying at a higher rate? What's behind the decline in US life expectancy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harddriver
  • Start date Start date
acceptance said:
Okay, first.. it's clearly not a conspiracy theory to suggest that the vaccines can kill. Your boy cnutz even admits it. And we of course all know that the vaccines are "safe and effective" because the TV and the politicians say so. :ROFLMAO: I've posted probably 10 scientific studies to back up what I say. Have you posted even one? Total NPC.
Click to expand...
Yeah so not only will you have a burning chest when they wheel you out on the gurney but you'll have burning ears knowing how you proudly defended being a guinea pig to anyone who would listen.
 
giphy.gif
 
CrazyNutz said:
LOL Ken Paxton is a fraudster hack. But hey lets see if he wins his case ?‍♀️
Click to expand...
How they arrived at 95% effective claim is a total lie with statistics, the absolute risk reduction was less than 1% and Pfizer knew this yet maintained the 95% claim. They were referring to Relative Risk Reduction in the initial study and not the Gold Standard Absolute Risk reduction factor which the FDA is supposed to use for evaluating all drugs and medical treatments. You're a smart numbers guy you should know the differences between the statistical inversion which is fraudulent to bring any drug to market under EUA of course. If fraud was used to apply for EUA then they do not have liability protection.

Since you probably won't read the Pfizer reports here is the report on the FDA released documents where they acknowledge 1291 possible side effects but that's all a conspiracy....but a conspiracy that has put people's health at risk including yours... so I'm glad you aren't going to take any more injections that don't stop infection nor transmission and forces your own cells to manufacture spike proteins which we now know is causing damage to vital organs cells including the heart, but you already knew that. We're all glad that you have no side effects from the injections but thats definitely not the case with many reported to the VAERS system but I imagine record amounts of side effects in all vaccines combined for over 30 years is also some type of conspiracy.

From 1 year ago........


https://dailyclout.io/category/pfizer-and-moderna-reports/





The entire claim of 95% effective was based on a statistical lie so you can call Ken Paxton a fraudster all you like.....you were 100% lied to. I attached the framework of the actual case if you wish to read it and educate yourself. All if this data is in the Pfzier documents they wanted to hide for 75 years and they were forced to release by a Federal judge in Texas. Those documents are why Ken Paxton was able to build a case using Pfizer's own documentation.
 
CrazyNutz said:
Bro, I dunno about Pfzier. I had Moderna. It 100% worked against the first strain. Again the wife and I had our Grandson 100% of the time when he had COVID. We did not get so much as a sniffle. If you've had kids in the 3 to 4 year of age range you know they are all up in your face, and he was.
Click to expand...
LOL, you're 40 not 400, of course it was no big deal. I never got a sniffle either but I didn't take any moderna therefore it wasn't the moderna that kept you sniffle free dog.
 
CrazyNutz said:
Bro, I dunno about Pfzier. I had Moderna. It 100% worked against the first strain. ?‍♂️
Click to expand...
I understand why you and many of my friends took it.... because you were told it was 95% effective and totally safe and you wanted to believe in the science. Pfizer and Moderna is almost identical except Modern actually has more dose in the injection but you need to look into who actually holds the patents on the vaccines. I'm sorry to tell you the Moderna and Pfzier did not 100% work against the first strain, the Pfizer clinical trial data reveal this and it is quite obvious, you are still emotionally invested in the initial claim(lie) about it's efficacy. If the documents did not reveal what they have then Ken Paxtons' case would be defamatory in nature and he would not be able to bring it unless he had the facts and figures.


No one can make you read the documents but your claim that it 100% worked is incorrect, the stated Relative Risk reduction of 95% versus the Absolute Risk reduction of .85% is absolute proof of fraud, hence Ken Paxton's suit..
 
Last edited:
CrazyNutz said:
Dude, you cannot tell me my first hand experience was invalid. It 100% worked, I had the first strain in my house many times not only from my Grandson that was literally sneezing, and coughing in our faces for 2-3 weeks, to several family members that brought it over. THE WIFE AND I NEVER CONTRACTED IT.

Now, it did not work against Omicron, and I knew it would not. I did not care, I knew Omicron was mild so I wanted to just let it take it's course., and it did very easily, and quickly.
Click to expand...
If you feel it helped I cannot make you see what you don't want to see so I won't try. I said the reality of the initial Relative Risk reduction claim of 95% versus the Absolute Risk Reduction of .85% reveals the actual efficacy of the first genomic strain vaxxx being essentially worthless statistically by any measure according the FDA standards of drug evaluation efficacy always used Absolute Risk Reduction.

Article from Columbia University below:

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia....lute-risk-reduction-500-doctors-want-to-know/


https://www.fda.gov/files/about fda/published/Communicating-Risk-and-Benefits---An-Evidence-Based-User's-Guide-(Printer-Friendly).pdf

From the FDA’s Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User’s Guide 2011. Note absolute risk is mentioned 11 times, A few tidbits:


‘Another statistical choice is between reporting relative or absolute
risks. Because there is no way to infer the latter from the former, absolute
risks are always more informative. Doubling a risk means very different things
if that entails going from 10% to 20% or from 0.001% to 0.002%.16 Even when
they contain the same information, different summaries can highlight different
perspectives, hence bias choices.17’ From the conclusion:


‘What general practical advice can the science support?
In this final section, we recommend ways to nudge individuals towards
better comprehension and greater welfare. How to present information is an
important choice for information providers that should be made with care
using an evidence-based approach.
2. Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly
influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk
approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk
format should be used.’
 
Last edited:
CrazyNutz said:
OK boomer. But while our dumb ass MAGA family members, and friends were scared, and crying in agony from that original strain. We were dropping off care packages at their door steps, and feeling just fine.
Click to expand...
*...they clock in at 400lbs/piece :ROFLMAO: :rolleyes:
 
If you look at the side effects on a common laxative they list all sorts of things. There are side effects to nearly every drug - they all go through the liver for a start. Most side effects are mild. Some are severe. The severe ones are rare or they don't get approval. In the case of the vaccine I'd be betting billions of people have had it now. Even the contraceptive pill for women has side effects for some of them. Paracetamol... Ibuprofen... you name it... even aspirin... Caffeine... Alcohol... The side effects of COVID are many as well and some of them range from temporary discomfort right up to long term organ damage and death. As I've said before, the risk of side effects from the vaccine are low and the risk from COVID if it goes down to your lungs is high. We've all had some respiratory viruses that didn't do much and other times they knock us around. There is no rhyme or reason to why some people are more susceptible than other others but the risk of from COVID is and was higher than taking the vaccine by a long margin. There are plenty of studies and now experience to back that up. To say there are x number of side effects means nothing without looking at the frequency of the side effects and the severity.
 
Thumbpicker said:
If you look at the side effects on a common laxative they list all sorts of things
Click to expand...
And when’s the last time you heard of someone dying from ex lax? I’ve heard of a lot of people dying from the COVID shot. Excess mortality in 2023… Keeling over on the TV, high school sports, you name it. Funny though, everyone says it’s not the vax, must be “long COVID” or climate change ?‍♂️?
 
acceptance said:
And when’s the last time you heard of someone dying from ex lax? I’ve heard of a lot of people dying from the COVID shot. Excess mortality in 2023… Keeling over on the TV, high school sports, you name it. Funny though, everyone says it’s not the vax, must be “long COVID” or climate change ?‍♂️?
Click to expand...
He's a company man. He all but receives a paycheck from Pfizer.
 
VonBonfire said:
He's a company man. He all but receives a paycheck from Pfizer.
Click to expand...
They don’t even need money at this point. They invested when they injected that toxic crap right into their arm. Too much at stake to acknowledge what they did to themselves, their kids, etc.
 
acceptance said:
And when’s the last time you heard of someone dying from ex lax? I’ve heard of a lot of people dying from the COVID shot. Excess mortality in 2023… Keeling over on the TV, high school sports, you name it. Funny though, everyone says it’s not the vax, must be “long COVID” or climate change ?‍♂️?
Click to expand...
Go to google and type death from laxatives.. If you go looking for anything on google to validate any argument you're sure to find it. I looked - yes there have been deaths. So if you are true to form you'll start a thread with a conspiracy against laxatives.
 
Also if you type in death from drinking to too much water you'll find that happens too. Are you afraid of drinking water now?
 
Thumbpicker said:
Also if you type in death from drinking to too much water you'll find that happens too. Are you afraid of drinking water now?
Click to expand...
Except water isn't under an emergency use authorization. It is not an experimental compound.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top