MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
Here's an article I came across from 2019 by the CBC-NYC from when Cuomo and DeBlasio were attempting to pass a pied-a-terre tax. (link at bottom) It lays out some of the same flaws that are being overlooked now. One thing of note from the article is the people who own luxury 2nd homes pay the same/similar property & other taxes as full time residents while using less city resources.I used Rolex and Bugatti as examples of expensive things that sell EVEN WHEN the price goes up. (Veblen goods) If the price of ownership of a luxury apartment goes up a few percentage points, it's not going to affect the market. Those people who can't afford the small increase can't afford the place (or item) in the first place.
And, the only place you can own a NYC penthouse, is in NYC. Sure, a penthouse in Wisconsin might be 1/10 the price but it's 1/10 the price BECAUSE it's in Wisconsin. A $5M apartment in NYC is that much because of the location.
Anyhow, time will tell which of us is correct.
As said though, what happens next is all speculative for the moment. I just don't see it being a net positive for NYC.
I think @IndyWS6 made a good general point. Everyone should pay their fair share, but why should someone be penalized with extra taxes for being successful? IMO imposing extra taxes on the wealthy points to jealousy, not fairness.
https://cbcny.org/research/pied-terre-tax