hoss33":3kckzs5z said:It is not about the shape of the guitar, it is about putting "Gibson" on the headstock, which some builders do.
True but they should not put the Gibson and Les Paul logos on the headstock.Stealthtastic":3ulid5ke said:hoss33":3ulid5ke said:It is not about the shape of the guitar, it is about putting "Gibson" on the headstock, which some builders do.
It doesn't matter because these builders aren't really cutting into Gibson's profits. Gibson doesn't make a good 59' replica that is insanely close to the real thing.
hoss33":1gcf88pt said:True but they should not put the Gibson and Les Paul logos on the headstock.Stealthtastic":1gcf88pt said:hoss33":1gcf88pt said:It is not about the shape of the guitar, it is about putting "Gibson" on the headstock, which some builders do.
It doesn't matter because these builders aren't really cutting into Gibson's profits. Gibson doesn't make a good 59' replica that is insanely close to the real thing.
Rogue":w2eor67h said:Just imagine the butthurt around here if someone redid a 80s Yngwie tune and made money off it because it was better than what Yngwie puts out now.
The butthurt would be as long as the internet.