
napalmdeath
Well-known member
I find them more aggressive, a little more low-mid focused, and nice thump.man of few words I see
and what did they do the tone of the amp vs EL-34's ?
I find them more aggressive, a little more low-mid focused, and nice thump.man of few words I see
and what did they do the tone of the amp vs EL-34's ?
What did the kit-77’s do to the tone?
I’ve used these in other amps that were 6l6/el-34 switchable with pretty good results
Which KT-77’s did you use?
I’m not yet that experienced with tube swapping, but so far that’s been my experience as well. I have a friend nearby who has lots of EL34 amps I’ve played many times before (Engl’s, Uberschall, EVH’s, Cameron’s, Marshall’s, Herbert and others), but he swapped them all with KT77’s and I didn’t like any of them as much for those same reasons you mentioned. Seemed like an awkward middle ground between a 6L6 and EL34. They seemed to lose that aggressive EL34 mid growl that I was used to hearing in them. Not sure why he likes them so much. I’ve not really liked any tube so far that starts with KT, but still curious to hear an amp with KT90’s, 120’s or 150’s. Maybe it could be the specific tubes he chose, but so far I seem not to like KT77’s as muchNever tried them in a Splawn... but have tried KT77s in Diezels, Marshall’s, and other amps... and the KT77s are darker, smoother, less edge, more bass and low end. The mids are different and lower too. I prefer EL43s by a wide margin. Many builders use KT77s as it is easier and cheaper to find a reliable set of JJ KT77s... but cheaper and more reliable always don’t sound better.
I should say that time has passed since my last post in the thread, but I now have a QR, PM, and a Nitro as well as the SS.
I really dig my Splawns tbh. I don't think that for a grand used you can get a better built amp. Great Iron, great quality components and very well built. Durable and nice cabs too and tolex work, etc. I don't think that the quality of work can be had at that price point anywhere else. I have not been on the inside of a Ceriatone but I have read about issues with the transformers and other things. Splawn is a pretty safe bet for a damn solid amp for reliability and they sound pretty damn good. They are pretty fussy with some speakers and cabs though and that is really my only complaint. But get them in front of the right cab and watch the paint peel in satisfaction.
For power tubes in the QR, I have ran a few different EL34's in the last month or two just messing around and I was stupid lucky to have it come with the quad of =C= that were in it, but I pulled those out to tuck away for recording or something in the future. Everything else has since been a disappointment but I have Mullard new production EL34 in now and it's pretty solid and I like it. I highly recommend a Sovtek 12AX7LPS for the PI and for the other preamp tubes I am not 100% accurate on what is in there now but it sounds great. I also recommend that if you have not tried it with a FL cab to give it a shot.
Good info, thanks. I had a Pro Stock B+ and didn't find it too stiff, but it doesn't have the Friedman 3D sound or feel, either, which I just came from the Friedman camp after owning 4 of them. I've had to downsize recently and put cash back in my pocket.
I'm willing to try Splawn again, but feel I'm gonna want to get a little more saturation, bounce, give, out of it. I do a lot of lead work with big bends and don't want to fight it too much and I honestly can't remember exactly what the feel was like. I do remember thinking I wasn't sure boosting it with a TS pedal was my favorite, and think now that I would boost it with some sort of clean boost to get a bit more of that saturation and 'give' in the feel.
I've always read good things about the Yet/Chupa (minus the non-buffored loops and transformers), but I've never played one. There's one for sale on here locally by me.
Thanks again for the input.
I have read a few things about Ceriatone iron but that was either a batch of flukes or an issue that they have since corrected. I have actually bought transformers from Ceriatone for some home builds to great results. The only thing about them is they are freaking huge. They dont get hot at all. The build quality of a Ceriatone is pretty damn amazing.I should say that time has passed since my last post in the thread, but I now have a QR, PM, and a Nitro as well as the SS.
I really dig my Splawns tbh. I don't think that for a grand used you can get a better built amp. Great Iron, great quality components and very well built. Durable and nice cabs too and tolex work, etc. I don't think that the quality of work can be had at that price point anywhere else. I have not been on the inside of a Ceriatone but I have read about issues with the transformers and other things. Splawn is a pretty safe bet for a damn solid amp for reliability and they sound pretty damn good. They are pretty fussy with some speakers and cabs though and that is really my only complaint. But get them in front of the right cab and watch the paint peel in satisfaction.
For power tubes in the QR, I have ran a few different EL34's in the last month or two just messing around and I was stupid lucky to have it come with the quad of =C= that were in it, but I pulled those out to tuck away for recording or something in the future. Everything else has since been a disappointment but I have Mullard new production EL34 in now and it's pretty solid and I like it. I highly recommend a Sovtek 12AX7LPS for the PI and for the other preamp tubes I am not 100% accurate on what is in there now but it sounds great. I also recommend that if you have not tried it with a FL cab to give it a shot.
Splawns will clean up your playing quick and sound good getting you there LOL. I remember that happening when I got my first Splawn.
I definitely prefer the Splawn to the Friedman personally but both are great. Splawn is raw, Friedman is polished. The right spot in the middle is certainly not a bad thing.
Ceriatone is a good middle point between a Splawn and a Friedman in my experience. I've only owned a 2204, Molecular and Leviathan. If you dont need multiple channels I would go with the molecular all day. Especially for tones that arent modern high gain. I sold my Molecular with the intent on getting a 2 channel version but ended up going with a leviathan. The Leviathan is a cool amp no question about it but I think in hindsight I would have been fine with the single channel molecular.Played Ceriatone? Where does it fit? I'd love to play the 'in-between' of a Splawn and newer Friemdan, which I find rawer than the older Friedmans.
Ive had 3 splawns 2 22w supersports and a 40w street-rod. Way too bright for my ears, I guess I like darker sounding amps, and LOUD. Forget about playing at home at any low volumes. Does not sound great ala Friedman, Bogner etc.. If you can turn it up, man do they punch and thump, great for live playing. Ymmv.
Glad it worked for you. I did use the loop control but found that below 1/2 it just thinned out the tone. I tried to EQ differently but didnt help. With the loop vol up tone got thicker but channel vol was too touchy then and it got loud quick. Used an EVH 4x12.
I had a yeti I used for my metal band for a little while. That was one of my favorite tones, just killer soundingI am debating a used UK-made 90s Marshall versus a Ceriatone, versus.... a number of ~$3000 amps that probably sound too much like an (undesirable) American amp (MESA DR or SLO).
For death-doom, the name "King Kong" sounds appropriate, but I've not tried any of these Ceriatone amps.
Not sure many on this forum have tried the Ceriatone models inside their own homes, with their own rigs for extreme metal (black metal/death-doom).