A truthful answer about 100 watt heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter BDuncan
  • Start date Start date
Ok here's a relevant example I did a few years ago. 35, 60, 100, 150 & 180W heads in the band mix. As everyone says it's not about the volume- it's about the girth.



To take it a step further, here's the same type of demo with 2x12 vs 4x12 in the band mix.


Hah, I thought the Mark V 35 sat in the mix really good to be honest, better than a couple of the amps that came after it, maybe all of them?? As far as cabs, the OS slant had the most cut.
 
I think much of the perceived "need" to crank tube amps is not so much intended power stage distortion but it's resulting from a relative absence of percussive low end thump at lower volumes. Sometimes in situations where you can't hear yourself that well with a band, a nice percussive tight thump helps with feeling your way through the song in a sense. In many cases a higher wattage amp with a decent master volume circuit can achieve fuller and thicker tones at a lower volume than straining a lower wattage amp by cranking it in a vain effort to fill out the bottom end.
 
Are any of those simulclass? Those ones are 150 watts, not that it makes much difference lol.
The MkIII was KDRG / Simul, it couldn't hang so I sold it. It was noticeably less powerful (and less toneful) than the MkII KRGs.

Some guys like a thinner sound like with the little 35- and that's fine if that's what works for them. I just think it's important to be honest / realistic about what you're actually trying to accomplish. Lower wattage amps & higher wattage amps don't do the same thing. Same with smaller cabs vs. bigger cabs.
 
I think much of the perceived "need" to crank tube amps is not so much intended power stage distortion but it's resulting from a relative absence of percussive low end thump at lower volumes. Sometimes in situations where you can't hear yourself that well with a band, a nice percussive tight thump helps with feeling your way through the song in a sense. In many cases a higher wattage amp with a decent master volume circuit can achieve fuller and thicker tones at a lower volume than straining a lower wattage amp by cranking it in a vain effort to fill out the bottom end.

I think alot of this is blues, indie rock, classic rock type players simply not understanding how hard the drums need to be hit to sound right in a metal/punk/hardcore context

Which correlates with how much headroom is needed to keep things from sounding like mush when the whole band is fast and loud
 
I'm looking for an honest answer. How often have you had to crank a 100 watt head or combo?
Never, but they sound better at lower volumes than low watt amps do. At least master volume amps do.

That said, playing thru a cranked 2203, super lead, dual rec, or slo is an experience you remember. You feel it in your body. Literally.
 
This is spot on with 1987’s and 2204’s. Also mid 60’s Fender Bassman heads just crank.
Was gonna mention the Bassman. A cranked bassman hit with a tube screamer, going thru a 4x12 loaded with GBs is FN RnR. That would be my rig if I could play at those volumes. Glorious.
 
I think alot of this is blues, indie rock, classic rock type players simply not understanding how hard the drums need to be hit to sound right in a metal/punk/hardcore context

Which correlates with how much headroom is needed to keep things from sounding like mush when the whole band is fast and loud
Maybe if they changed the heads and tuned them once a decade they wouldn’t need to crush them. ?

I get what you are saying though, but glad I don’t have to play with “metal” drummers anymore.
 
They're a nice piece to the puzzle.
V30s aren't bad either.
What do you use?
I use some of the old g12-75's in an early 90s Lee Jackson era cab with a 74 Silverface bassman. I have been using an 808 clone gifted to me by Griff from here (killer pedal).
54D5C982-0D80-4509-8740-C4F5BAB25B01.jpeg
 
Maybe if they changed the heads and tuned them once a decade they wouldn’t need to crush them. ?

I get what you are saying though, but glad I don’t have to play with “metal” drummers anymore.
Every competent metal drummer I've played with changed and tuned their kit a whole hell of a lot more than the jazz cats, lol

Heavy music....It's literally all rimshots on the snare. You literally cannot do this with even "moderate" force and make it sound like 'metal.' Or modern punk and hardcore, for that matter.

If the drums have to be hit that hard, and are that loud, then the guitarists need the headroom to balance everything, unless you want to sound like a mess.

That's why metal players always laugh at the "hurr durr why do you need 100 watts" posts ?
 
The MkIII was KDRG / Simul, it couldn't hang so I sold it. It was noticeably less powerful (and less toneful) than the MkII KRGs.

Some guys like a thinner sound like with the little 35- and that's fine if that's what works for them. I just think it's important to be honest / realistic about what you're actually trying to accomplish. Lower wattage amps & higher wattage amps don't do the same thing. Same with smaller cabs vs. bigger cabs.
Couldn't hang, at a 150 watts, lol. You'd think a simulclass coliseum would have a more 3D kinda sound due to the power section, or at least some extra harmonic content at band volumes??

I just thought the V 35 sat in the mix really well vs the older Marks that kinda sounded like they were missing some high frequencies in the mix, and the rectos had this high end fizz character that was clashing with the cymbals a lot. I thought the dual and triple sounded about equal, and the coliseum honestly didn't sound much bigger than the 60 watt.

I think when your in a mix like that with the bass pumping having over 100 watts becomes rather insignificant tone wise. You're just hearing the midrange and treble in the mix when a proper bass rig is pumping anyways. I think you usually need at least 50 watts in most situations though.
 
Last edited:
Was gonna mention the Bassman. A cranked bassman hit with a tube screamer, going thru a 4x12 loaded with GBs is FN RnR. That would be my rig if I could play at those volumes. Glorious.
One of my first tube heads was a 64 or 65 Fender Bassman. It needed a boost, or better yet two boosts but it sounded pretty damn cool.
 
Last edited:
I've played in a several situations where it made sense to turn it up pretty loud, but never had the volume up to even half.

By amp standards, I suppose that isn't cranked, but by decibel standards it certainly is.
With high gain amps I call the half way point cranked cause they sound like shit turned up more than 5 or 6, at least on most high gain amps. I find the sweet spot on most high gain amps to be around 3 or 4 (out of 10). That's still plenty loud.
 
Last edited:
Couldn't hang, at a 150 watts, lol. You'd think a simulclass coliseum would have a more 3D kinda sound due to the power section, or at least some extra harmonic content at band volumes??
Through the journey I've just learned that I don't like triode- at all- for metal. I want the full pentode punch. I've also learned that I'm not a Mark III guy, they sound like they have a blanket over them after coming from Mark IIs. Also, Simul or not, the Mk III Coli power sections are not as beefy as the MkII Coli power sections. The filtering is different but more importantly the II Coli power sections have 0 negative feedback.

For me personally in my 3 piece, I want huge amp girth that fills the room with unquestionable punch & clarity. With so many amps they sound killer at home, or even with the band in the garage, but when you play a big open space all the thickness of the tone just disappears. I remember the first time I gigged my Triple Recto I was like "what the fuck is happening here there's no balls in this room?!?!" The only two amps I've personally experienced that brought "fuck yeah" girth & tone to a big room were the MkII KRG and a SLO. The SLO wasn't metal enough for me, so the KRG it is. All other amps have been rehomed.

To be fair I never gigged the Wizard MTL, but (while it was huge) I thought the gain structure sucked so it didn't stick around that long.
 
100W heads are the standard in many ways, but back in my gigging days 50W was more than enough for everything other than super loud cleans, and that's zero fun. Very loud bands on bigger stages, all good.

That's not to say all are made equal, there's certainly some 50 watters that don't keep up. For example the single rectifier amps - could never gel with those. But a pair of EL34's or 6L6's with a well-designed power supply and output transformer feels great, especially if your cab is only rated at 100W!
Ya, some of those Mesa 50 watters don't seem to actually put out 50 watts. I had a .50 caliber + that had these tiny little transformers on it and volume wise it barely held up with a decent hitting drummer, so I swear the amp put closer to about 30 watts out in reality. I think that's why Pepper of COC had his modded and ran two when playing live. Next to a 60 watter or 75 watt simulclass Mark series Mesa, it wasn't even close power wise. Those have a much more formidable output section.
 
Through the journey I've just learned that I don't like triode- at all- for metal. I want the full pentode punch. I've also learned that I'm not a Mark III guy, they sound like they have a blanket over them after coming from Mark IIs. Also, Simul or not, the Mk III Coli power sections are not as beefy as the MkII Coli power sections. The filtering is different but more importantly the II Coli power sections have 0 negative feedback.

For me personally in my 3 piece, I want huge amp girth that fills the room with unquestionable punch & clarity. With so many amps they sound killer at home, or even with the band in the garage, but when you play a big open space all the thickness of the tone just disappears. I remember the first time I gigged my Triple Recto I was like "what the fuck is happening here there's no balls in this room?!?!" The only two amps I've personally experienced that brought "fuck yeah" girth & tone to a big room were the MkII KRG and a SLO. The SLO wasn't metal enough for me, so the KRG it is. All other amps have been rehomed.

To be fair I never gigged the Wizard MTL, but (while it was huge) I thought the gain structure sucked so it didn't stick around that long.
Ya, I'm not really a Mark III guy myself either and prefer pentode. It's not so much that a Mark III has that blanketed sound it's that it's very hard to dial them bright enough without them getting harsh I think?? So I would always end up dialing them dark to not kill my ears. That said, I've played some outdoor gigs with my old mark III and with a decent 4x12 it was plenty fat enough sounding for the job. After watching your vids i think your Bassist needs to upgrade his rig, it doesn't have enough balls to it to keep up with a decent half stack guitar rig IMO.

Also, have you ever tried running a second 4x12? and you need to play places that have a decent PA so you don't need to fill the room with your amp alone. If a triple rectifier ain't getting the job done you've gotta reconsider what the problem is... I mean Cannible Corpse use triple and dual rectifiers and their sound is brutal to say the least.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top