Systematically Erasing America.

[ccn]

OMG , should have known you would try to change things up , sorry not happening . You said unequivocally that Biden won legitimately there is no doubt which proves you have SHIT4BRAINS .

Like I said last time I already proved to you over and over and over again that what I said was true . I posted the information but you're too stupid to remember .

I never said I had detailed information as to the phone calls of Epps and Pelosi , I never claimed to be an intelligence insider . What I said is I saw a freedom of information act tweet about it which is the below:

I would love to know more details also but I don't and never said I did .

 

[ccn]

This is one of many articles on it.​

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6​

https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

 

[T.V.]

Like I said last time I already proved to you over and over and over again that what I said was true . I posted the information but you're too stupid to remember .

Just because you post something doesn’t mean you have proven something.

 

[Treeman]

Only thing they are going to produce is more shady memes, and a bunch of clown pics.

Agreed - but, damn if there was proof of 6 or 7 recorded phone calls between Pelosi and Epps that would be the scoop of the decade.
Those calls would be everywhere.
Instead @ccn copies and pastes something that says there were a dozen calls!

Hahahaha.

 

[ShitSquatch]

Just because you post something doesn’t mean you have proven something.

Pot meet kettle ^^^^^^

~ss

 

[ccn]

Just because you post something doesn’t mean you have proven something.

Did I ever say I had CONFIRMED PROOF ? No I didn't, try to pay attention , I said I saw a tweet a while back that reported that there were phone calls between Epps and Pelosi . I provided exactly what I said , that tweet . I didn't say it was confirmed true.

 

[T.V.]

Pot meet kettle ^^^^^^

~ss

Tell us more…

 

[Treeman]

 

[T.V.]

Like I said last time I already proved to you over and over and over again that what I said was true

Did I ever say I had CONFIRMED PROOF ? No I didn't, try to pay attention , I said I saw a tweet a while back that reported that there were phone calls between Epps and Pelosi . I provided exactly what I said , that tweet . I didn't say it was confirmed true.

 

[ccn]

Agreed - but, damn if there was proof of 6 or 7 recorded phone calls between Pelosi and Epps that would be the scoop of the decade.
Those calls would be everywhere.
Instead @ccn copies and pastes something that says there were a dozen calls!

Hahahaha.

Man you really are as stupid as everyone says you are .

You actually think that the mainstream (Where you get all your info from) would report that ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .

 

[Treeman]

Did I ever say I had CONFIRMED PROOF ? No I didn't, try to pay attention , I said I saw a tweet a while back that reported that there were phone calls between Epps and Pelosi . I provided exactly what I said , that tweet . I didn't say it was confirmed true.

Oh you saw in a tweet?

Look at the meme I found above! Not sure if confirmed but …

 

[ccn]

What I proved to him wasn't the Epps Pelosi topic it was a Clinton article that Lawnchair man refused to believe . Like I said try to pay attention that's two for two now.

 

[ccn]

Oh you saw in a tweet?

Look at the meme I found above! Not sure if confirmed but …

You can't remember a damn thing can you , your mind is worse than Biden's .

 

[Treeman]

What I proved to him wasn't the Epps Pelosi topic it was a Clinton article that Lawnchair man refused to believe . Like I said try to pay attention that's two for two now.

?

We are still waiting for proof of that quote in a national magazine.
You offered - zero - proof.
I lived through the Clinton follies.

Where is that interview?

 

[ccn]

LOL

 

[Krull]

T.V. thinks Kamala is "intelligent"...so there's that

 

[Treeman]

LOL
View attachment 186364

You don’t get it.
Big pharma might run the media- one would look at evidence and make a judgement based upon that.

I am trying to make it easy for you.

Whether or not recorded calls or a national interview exist is not a judgment or matter of opinion - it is a question of fact.

Where are the calls? Where is the interview?

 

[T.V.]

T.V. thinks Kamala is "intelligent"...so there's that

Kamala Harris has an impressive resume by any reasonable persons standards. To say otherwise is pure foolishness.

 

[Picasso]

Kamala Harris has an impressive resume by any reasonable persons standards. To say otherwise is pure foolishness.

 

[ccn]

Kamala Harris has an impressive resume by any reasonable persons standards. To say otherwise is pure foolishness.

If you're talking about sucking off strangers I agree 100% .