
311boogieman
Well-known member
Can we change the topic?


They announced a live action Legend Of Zelda Movie. I am filled to the brim with excitement and trepidationCan we change the topic?
![]()
YOU’RE WRONGThey announced a live action Legend Of Zelda Movie. I am filled to the brim with excitement and trepidation
I tried ignoring him the last couple days but I can still hear him sniffing around the door threshold like my dog when I'm trying to take a shit (and post on RigTalk)You two need to get separate rooms for awhile
![]()
Ohh ffs. I’m just a dude on the internet.I tried ignoring him the last couple days but I can still hear him sniffing around the door threshold like my dog when I'm trying to take a shit (and post on RigTalk)
I was kiddddding….vonbonny got it!You two need to get separate rooms for awhile
![]()
?I knew the more they chanted safe and effective that the more likely the poison was very deadly.
Link?I noticed an interesting article this morning where Moderna admits it's vaccine causes cancer
Not all of us...…so the vaccines didn’t work and can cause cancer but “The benefits outweigh the risks.” It’s so crazy to see how easy it is to hypnotize the masses.
For big pharma.....“The benefits outweigh the risks.”
Tell me why you don't believe the documented (And admitted) residual DNA isn't a cancer risk. My money is on "Because the TV says so."They don’t cause cancer. Why do you believe an article in a fringe newspaper. if you search for any position these days you’ll get all the disinformation you need.
They cause cancer. Big pharma has injured millions through the years. Time to put them out of business...They don’t cause cancer. Why do you believe an article in a fringe newspaper. if you search for any position these days you’ll get all the disinformation you need.
Nope - I don't watch TV about topics like that. I read the internet. I just don't fall for confirmation bias like some wanker.Tell me why you don't believe the documented (And admitted) residual DNA isn't a cancer risk. My money is on "Because the TV says so."
Because I read other papers that discount the risk rather than jumping to some conclusion driven by an agenda.Tell me why you don't believe the documented (And admitted) residual DNA isn't a cancer risk. My money is on "Because the TV says so."
Okay, fair enough. Any paper(s) in particular? Please link!Because I read other papers that discount the risk rather than jumping to some conclusion driven by an agenda.