
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Lol bless your heart.
wait-what were we talking about again?
Thank you for ceding the point that it wasn't intended as a horse dewormer.so it really had no “intention”
No, you said:I was called an idiot for saying that ivermectin came out as a horse medication
I provided the definition of the word intention, which you seemed to find funny. Again, as usual, I think you're disingenuous.it doesn’t really bother me that it’s intended use was as a horse de-wormer
It is funnyNo, you said:
I provided the definition of the word intention, which you seemed to find funny. Again, as usual, I think you're disingenuous.
...But why quibble about the meaning of words: "Man, woman, whatever!"
Yeah, I don’t like equivocation.Like I said, you are blinded by your agenda
Yeah, I don’t like equivocation.
I didn't argue that it's first application wasn't as a horse med. I argued that the discovers' intention was not to create a horse med, as far as I know anyways. If you can show me that's the case, as I said I will move on.The only possible reason for finding what I said as equivocal is that it doesn’t fit your agenda. Everything I have said has agreed with it being a perfectly viable medication for covid, yet you can’t accept that it all started as horse meds
Quit horsin’ around, this is a serious conversation.I took some ivermectin and now I stand a full 15 hands tall, my teeth look great and I have a nice shiny coat. Where's my oats Wilbur,...
OK I don't have an itchy ring now... and there are no wriggly things.Quit horsin’ around, this is a serious conversation.
So you called me an idiot for saying that a medication originally released solely for livestock was intended for livestock? You aren’t fooling anyone dudeI didn't argue that it's first application wasn't as a horse med. I argued that the discovers' intention was not to create a horse med, as far as I know anyways. If you can show me that's the case, as I said I will move on.
Maybe idiot was a bit harsh. But it was an inaccurate statement that erred in alignment with ridicule of the drug. If you think still you're right, show me, and I'll move on.So you called me an idiot for saying that a medication originally released solely for livestock was intended for livestock?
Lol you will never move on. you told me to ignore you last time, then kept on with the same limp dick pedantry.Maybe idiot was a bit harsh. But it was an inaccurate statement that erred in alignment with ridicule of the drug. If you think still you're right, show me, and I'll move on.
You will never acknowledge when you’re obviously wrong, and just claim, “Details.” You’re still free to block.Lol you will never move on.