Hey RT fuck bois

[Ben Waylin]

I said I don’t care lol. Why would I try and prove that I do?

I used to wonder how the hell someone as leftoid-wacko as you, managed to get bant from TGP.. now I get it.

This bullshit routine of yours was annoying enough to irritate the soy-boy moderators over at TehGearPage.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

You're "spreading the global warming message" to a very miniscule group of people, none of which have any power to do anything about "global warming", and who are just trying to live their lives and get by.

All you are doing is virtue signaling to 3 or 4 dudes who already think you are full of shit.

I don’t bring this shit up. You guys are the ones that always want to talk about it. I just come along for the ride. If you don’t want my take on something don’t ask me about it lol.

Also you accusing someone else of virtue signaling is fricking hilarious

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I used to wonder how the hell someone as leftoid-wacko as you, managed to get bant from TGP.. now I get it.

This bullshit routine of yours was annoying enough to irritate the soy-boy moderators over at TehGearPage.

Lol so you had a change of heart then?
You keep telling everyone how much I’ve changed since TGP and now I guess you realize no one gives a fuck , so you decide to say something like this. Get over it dude lol

 

[Bad Brain]

You asked for the chart not me homie

I asked for a controlled study actually.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I asked for a controlled study actually.

I’m not going to explain spectrum analysis to you dude. The experiment doesn’t have to be done in the atmosphere. The controlled studies get done in labs to learn how different molecules read out on the analysis.

Then they just take an analysis of whatever they want. They don’t rewrite the laws of chemistry for every different thing they test

 

[Bad Brain]

I’m not going to explain spectrum analysis to you dude. The experiment doesn’t have to be done in the atmosphere. The controlled studies get done in labs to learn how different molecules read out on the analysis.

Then they just take an analysis of whatever they want. They don’t rewrite the laws of chemistry for every different thing they test

As I already correctly explained, a lab experiment is not real life. But you do you lol

 

[Dan Gleesak]

As I already correctly explained, a lab experiment is not real life. But you do you lol

of course it is. CO2 in a lab is not any different than CO2 anywhere else.

if it was different, it wouldn't be CO2

 

[Bad Brain]

of course it is. CO2 in a lab is not any different than CO2 anywhere else.

if it was different, it wouldn't be CO2

Did you really go to college or not? There are obviously different variables at play that will affect the outcome.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Did you really go to college or not? There are obviously different variables at play that will affect the outcome.

Sure, sometimes. There is no reason to believe this is one of those times though aside from you just feeling like it

 

[Bad Brain]

Sure, sometimes. There is no reason to believe this is one of those times though aside from you just feeling like it

No, there are all kinds of meteorological and environmental factors. It’s silly to even suggest that’s not the case. But it’s okay, you do you!

 

[NowYou'rePlayingWithPower]

I have to play to my audience

I don't follow how that relates to your lack of knowledge on a subject that you continue to claim segments of as irrefutable despite obviously knowing very little about it, if anything at all.

 

[Ben Waylin]

I don't follow how that relates to your lack of knowledge on a subject that you continue to claim segments of as irrefutable despite obviously knowing very little about it, if anything at all.

He's just another troll.. virtue signaling to people he doesn't understand.

After the NASA, Pfizer, climate-change, drag queens BS wears thin, his only move left will be to start TDS threads.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

No, there are all kinds of meteorological and environmental factors. It’s silly to even suggest that’s not the case. But it’s okay, you do you!

There is nothing to say that they would alter way they are analyzed though. We can physically sample the air in the atmosphere.
And we can analyze it through light spectrums. It’s not a coincidence that they both show the same thing

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I don't follow how that relates to your lack of knowledge on a subject that you continue to claim segments of as irrefutable despite obviously knowing very little about it, if anything at all.

Well it’s too bad you feel that way. The things I have said are in fact proven to be true.

I would love to hear your take on it though instead of just shit posting, if you care to do so

 

[Dan Gleesak]

He's just another troll.. virtue signaling to people he doesn't understand.

After the NASA, Pfizer, climate-change, drag queens BS wears thin, his only move left will be to start TDS threads.

I can’t say I’ve started a climate change, pfizer or drag queen thread.

Lol virtue signaling

 

[Bad Brain]

There is nothing to say that they would alter way they are analyzed though. We can physically sample the air in the atmosphere.
And we can analyze it through light spectrums. It’s not a coincidence that they both show the same thing

I don't doubt that but that doesn't meant the overall effect is going to be the same. But you're welcome to assume so and even think that it's "proven."

 

[Bad Brain]

I would love to hear your take on it though

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I don't doubt that but that doesn't meant the overall effect is going to be the same. But you're welcome to assume so and even think that it's "proven."

That’s because it is proven lol. Even the article you keep posting doesn’t disprove it. It says that co2 isn’t the driving force behind global warming, which I agree with.
It doesn’t say that co2 does not hold heat in the atmosphere, it just says that there are a multitude of other factors creating said heat, which again is something I agree with and posted myself.

There is zero data that suggests co2 doesn’t act as a greenhouse gas

 

[Dan Gleesak]

View attachment 290018

I absolutely would. MonkeyMan and I don’t always see eye to eye but I enjoy his input. It’s well thought out and logical.
If she is so confident I am incorrect in my understandings of things I would have to believe she has a higher understanding than I do.

 

[Bad Brain]

That’s because he is proven lol. Even the article you keep posting doesn’t disprove it. It says that co2 isn’t the driving force behind global warming, which I agree with.
It doesn’t say that co2 does not hold heat in the atmosphere, it just says that there are a multitude of other factors creating said heat, which again is something I agree with and posted myself.

There is zero data that suggests co2 doesn’t act as a greenhouse gas

They are arguing that the relationships of these elements to the average earth temps are more complex than the simplistic idea that more CO2 "holds in" reflected heat or that this CO2 even comes from human activity.

“CO2 does not cause global warming. Global warming causes more CO2,” said Edwin Berry, a theoretical physicist and certified consulting meteorologist. He called Royal Society’s position on CO2 “pure junk science.”