Hey RT fuck bois

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
Well, I'm still waiting to be enlightened with your understanding of why that would be. If you can't understand the correlation between a few hundred dollar drone landing itself and a few hundred million dollar one, not. Than you really have no place to say anything is factual outside of what you've been told.
Click to expand...

Because you fly a drone through air. It can use air pressure to stay in the air, to slow down, and also to land. Not to mention the aid of GPS. Aerodynamics are pretty well understood at this point.

The moon has no air. And no GPS. Plus the landers are going like a couple thousand miles an hour on their approach. They have to use rockets to slow down. It’s not that simple and it’s not the same thing.

If they could just send a helicopter to the moon, I’m sure they would have by now.

Compared to mars, where they did send a drone that worked wonderfully. It has an atmosphere. They strapped the lander to a big ass parachute and it worked fucking fantastic lol
 
Last edited:
Aynirar27 said:
Yes some things are settled and factual. Like the moon landing.
Click to expand...
It’s hearsay, not fact. You don’t gave direct evidence of a moon landing. There is no “proof” and no scientific test to independently verify the claim. Only trust in what you’ve been told.
 
Aynirar27 said:
Because you fly a drone through air. It can use air pressure to stay in the air, to slow down, and also to land. Not to mention the aid of GPS. Aerodynamics are pretty well understood at this point.

The moon has no air. And no GPS. Plus the landers are going like a couple thousand miles an hour on their approach. They have to use rockets to slow down. It’s not that simple and it’s not the same thing.

If they could just send a helicopter to the moon, I’m sure they would have by now.

Compared to mars, where they did send a drone that worked wonderfully. It has an atmosphere. They strapped the lander to a big ass parachute and it worked fucking fantastic lol
Click to expand...

The drone lands itself due to gyros, dude. Not anything else. In the case of the moon crafts,they should have these as well as laser range finders in conjunction with sonar to map the surface. It's not rocket science, and your answer isn't relevant in the slightest.
 
Aynirar27 said:
It’s like an old time TGP selfie thread. I think I hit 50 pages when I announced I was switching lotion brands
Click to expand...
Where is your taste test video you did? I was looking on utube for that the other day.
 
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
The drone lands itself due to gyros, dude. Not anything else. In the case of the moon crafts,they should have these as well as laser range finders in conjunction with sonar to map the surface. It's not rocket science, and your answer isn't relevant in the slightest.
Click to expand...

Lol it is 1000% percent rocket science because rockets are the one and only way to speed up or slow down.
 
Aynirar27 said:
Because you fly a drone through air. It can use air pressure to stay in the air, to slow down, and also to land. Not to mention the aid of GPS. Aerodynamics are pretty well understood at this point.

The moon has no air. And no GPS. Plus the landers are going like a couple thousand miles an hour on their approach. They have to use rockets to slow down. It’s not that simple and it’s not the same thing.

If they could just send a helicopter to the moon, I’m sure they would have by now.

Compared to mars, where they did send a drone that worked wonderfully. It has an atmosphere. They strapped the lander to a big ass parachute and it worked fucking fantastic lol
Click to expand...

Trying to explain things like you know what you're talking about. I'm embarrassed for you.
 
acceptance said:
It’s hearsay, not fact. You don’t gave direct evidence of a moon landing. There is no “proof” and no scientific test to independently verify the claim. Only trust in what you’ve been told.
Click to expand...

Eh that’s kinda gay dude. I’m not willing to accept that the only way to prove something is to experience it yourself.
To put it in perspective when you say stuff like that I react the same as the rest of us do when PLX accuses us of not playing guitar because we don’t post Van Halen clips
 
CRAIG4FSU said:
Where is your taste test video you did? I was looking on utube for that the other day.
Click to expand...

I couldn’t find it either but shredsquatch hooked me up with a link a while ago. It’s an old account of mine

It is still best enjoyed with the captions on lol

 
Aynirar27 said:
Eh that’s kinda gay dude. I’m not willing to accept that the only way to prove something is to experience it yourself.
Click to expand...
That’s not what I said.
Aynirar27 said:
To put it in perspective when you say stuff like that I react the same as the rest of us do when PLX accuses us of not playing guitar because we don’t post Van Halen clips
Click to expand...
…but you haven’t been to the moon, and don’t have proof, just what you’ve been told about it.
 
acceptance said:
The belief is irrelevant — she’s criticizing how you’re thinking about it all, as well as your apparent lack of general understanding and knowledge.
Click to expand...

She’s just trying to be obnoxious lol. Anyone that says landing on the moon isn’t rocket science is just taking a piss
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top