NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
My thoughts exactly on your last dozen or so posts, SR.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
I'm arguing "neuroscience edition 2"'s view. I suppose that's idiotic and I should just continue to argue with someone set on being wrong.
Bad Brain
Well-known member
Maybe I’m wrong. Give me an authoritative reference.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
I just did. If you want to start at biology and work your way up that might be a good path since they will be prerequisites to the latter.
?
Until that time, I guess we're not going to see eye to eye given your equating "mutant" with "racial purity," "does not require" with absolution, or attempting to state repeatedly that I ever said or hinted that because someone has specific sexual organs that they are that sex. Never once did I say or allude to that.
Sorry if you feel that everyone is either a male or female and my understanding is that is not the case. That doesn't make a person not human any more than it would if they have red hair. There are plenty of references to backup my position and aren't afraid to call things for what they are. The other side of things would prefer not to say anything other than "it's complicated." Which it's not. They're just afraid of the pc police cancelling them, imo.
Bad Brain
Well-known member
A specific reference ?…"neuroscience edition 2"? Who is the author/editor? What year?
All I’m asking is that your support your claim that there exists more than two classifications for biological sex in humans.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
Bad Brain
Well-known member
You can’t substantiate your claim. Just a made up reference to “neuroscience edition 2” ?
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
It should have said 5 just typed 2, so, you're totally right
"Made up reference" to a book that exists that contains your answer.
You may have won the Gold in mental gymnastics.
Dan shouldn't even be here, it's not even a competition.
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
i dunno what i said in the moon threads that pissed her off so much but here we are lol
Bad Brain
Well-known member
Okay then, who is the author or publisher?It should have said 5 just typed 2, so, you're totally right
"Made up reference" to a book that exists that contains your answer.
You may have won the Gold in mental gymnastics.
Dan shouldn't even be here, it's not even a competition.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
I think you should change your name back to denialist.
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
It’s super interesting to see how it is all playing out lol.
like in one thread they are saying that a man can totally be born with a vagina, and in a different thread they are upset that someone put tampons in the boys room.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
Who is they, Gaslighter?
Bad Brain
Well-known member
I figured you’d be appreciating this ?
MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
If I'm thinking about the same book I believe this is the one:
It's on the 6th edition now, but the older one still holds up fine.
Title: Neuroscience. 2nd edition
ISBN: 0-87893-742-0
Author: Purves, Dale Williams, Stephen Mark
Publisher: Sinauer Associates 2001
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
Well, there was the many times you said that I said we could fly a drone on the moon when I never stated that. You then tried to insult my intelligence when I am many fold more knowledgeable on the subject. Just like this one where SR is trying the same methods. Because, you know if it didn't work the first time, try, try again.
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Well-known member
It's Oxford up until Sinauer. Many more authors, but those search engines are so pesky for some people
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
“They” would be the people who are both saying that this boxer is a man and also posting #tampontim
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Yea that was all way after several nights of shitty comments from you. I’m not denying my part in keeping it going, but I have no idea what made you start being a dick about it all in the first place.
Personally I still blame PLX for it because your comments mirrored his to a tee, and that’s kinda his thing, but who knows.
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
I really really am.
Plus I don’t even feel the need to post because you already got it covered
