Redefining Language

  • Thread starter Thread starter NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
  • Start date Start date
The term banking means betting, but you won't bet.

Apologies for using that expression. I’m not betting money on something like this. Sportsbooks have some goofy ass bets but this is too much lol
 
I am banking on her being born with a vagina. I have no idea if she has some balls buried inside or not.

I would definitely take a bet that she cut her dick off. I’m not betting money though lol
Did you see the dick pic of the guy in the red shorts posted?
I’m sure you saw that, and you still think he has a vagina?
So do you think he has both?
Dude WTF?
How can you see something with your own eyes then decide you didn’t see what you just
saw?
 
Did you see the dick pic of the guy in the red shorts posted?
I’m sure you saw that, and you still think he has a vagina?
So do you think he has both?
Dude WTF?
How can you see something with your own eyes then decide you didn’t see what you just
saw?

I’ve already told you my reasoning for why I think she has a vagina. Seems like solid reasoning to me
 
I agree but why does the US allow women in the military. That's mortal combat. Yes we allow them in as well but I don't agree with it.
Yes that’s true. I don’t necessarily agree with that either, but there are a ton of roles they can do fine within the military. Trench warfare is probably not one of them.
For whatever reason, I do feel that’s a little different, a female who desides on her own to go into a combat situation is different from a female who spends a decade training to fight other females and is then forced to go hands on with a male.
But that is a great point
 
Jeez dude what set you off this time? This boxer has been fighting as a female her entire career, ok? She didn’t pull a switcheroo to get into Paris. Fuck sakes


as for your first paragraph, sorry you disagree?? I don’t really know what to say. I stated my option that standardized genetic testing for all sports is a bad idea, a slippery slope, and scarier to me than mandatory vaccines. What is wrong with saying that? Fucking unhinged lol

You're catching up to the other fool for mental gymnastics, and at least you finally admit that you're unhinged. You flip flop on almost every subject just to argue. You appear to believe that because someone participates because they're the best in their country, made it that far, that suddenly they're okay with losing opportunities just to satisfy imbeciles and sociopaths (ANYONE who sees nothing wrong with this because PC or rules).

You have no constitution. You aren't valiant in your pretend virtue flipflopping bs. Literally no one said there was anything wrong with you saying any of that, it's actually appreciated that you show your ignorance. You're very good at it.
 
Last edited:
I agree but why does the US allow women in the military. That's mortal combat. Yes we allow them in as well but I don't agree with it.

Most who join are in support or logistics. Those involved in combat know what they're getting themselves into, unlike sports apparently.
So, either give up because it might be a man or mutant that I'm boxing or continue and it might be a man or mutant that I'm boxing. Speak out against it and be destroyed by the woke. Don't speak out against it and be destroyed by a man or a mutant and dubbed okay with it.
 
You're catching up to the other fool for mental gymnastics, and at least you finally admit that you're unhinged. You flip flop on almost every subject just to argue. You appear to believe that because someone participates because they're the best in their country, made it that far, that suddenly they're okay with losing opportunities just to satisfy imbeciles and sociopaths (ANYONE who sees nothing wrong with this because PC or rules).

You have no constitution. You aren't valiant in your pretend virtue flipflopping bs. Literally no one said there was anything wrong with you saying any of that, it's actually appreciated that you show your ignorance. You're very good at it.

What are you going on about now?


Is this not enough for you. Even the people you are white knighting for don’t agree with your ramblings

IMG_9464.png
 
Last edited:
@NowYou'rePlayingWithPower has yet to specify what makes a 100% man or women and what degree of variation would preclude that. Nor has she justified the reason why an intersex person would be excluded and on what basis. She and her dumb sidekick are just floating texts and concepts with the air of academic superiority and then have ego fits when challenged which devolve into personal attacks. They are not acknowledging the nuances of dimorphic traits or genetic variation. All this supposedly to “protect women” but is clearly some sort of quest for genetic purity, as she doesn’t want someone like Imane fighting men either.
 
Last edited:
Most who join are in support or logistics. Those involved in combat know what they're getting themselves into, unlike sports apparently.
So, either give up because it might be a man or mutant that I'm boxing or continue and it might be a man or mutant that I'm boxing. Speak out against it and be destroyed by the woke. Don't speak out against it and be destroyed by a man or a mutant and dubbed okay with it.
Plus the ones who do decide to go into red zones are outfitted with very nice M4’s or a role-specific weapon that I’m pretty sure they are proficient with.
 
I'm saying someone with both organs born naturally is not a mutant.. This isn't that difficult of a concept.

What do you think caused them to be born with both sets of sexual organs? You're right, it's not at all difficult.
 
Plus the ones who do decide to go into red zones are outfitted with very nice M4’s or a role-specific weapon that I’m pretty sure they are proficient with.
I would hope they all are proficient. Men, women, and mutants alike. I wouldn't want to carry a wounded 200lb+ man though, so... It's all relative.
 
I'll help in any way I can Daniel.
I’m fascinated in God’s role in modern and future societies. Not really in the sense that I think what He would do will change, but more so how to maintain the connection the further away from the genesis of man we get.
 
I’m fascinated in God’s role in modern and future societies. Not really in the sense that I think what He would do will change, but more so how to maintain the connection the further away from the genesis of man we get.
It might pay to read Revelations, which ultimately describes a sort-of end point where there is a new heavens and a new earth. It's a complex book filled with allegory but Rev chapter 21 is fairly straightforward about that time in history. As for the current age, a separate thread would probably be best, or just PM's. Whatever you like. Def a fairly in depth subject....

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation 21&version=NIV
 
It might pay to read Revelations, which ultimately describes a sort-of end point where there is a new heavens and a new earth. It's a complex book filled with allegory but Rev chapter 21 is fairly straightforward about that time in history. As for the current age, a separate thread would probably be best, or just PM's. Whatever you like. Def a fairly in depth subject....

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation 21&version=NIV

Yeaaa that’s what I’m talking about. I like that balance of future humans exploring the universe, but still under the premise that God created the universe.
I guess my thought is, it’s been a long time since people started walking the earth, what has God been up to in all that time? I know it’s erroneous to “humanize” Him, but if he has the ability to watch over all of mankind, who’s to say that uses even a fraction of his capacity. He had his reasons for Earth, maybe he had reasons for other planets and civilizations too and He just didn’t tell us because it’s none of our dang business.

I guess I’m not really looking for answers from you, more of a general idea of if that kind of stuff is ever discussed.
 
Yeaaa that’s what I’m talking about. I like that balance of future humans exploring the universe, but still under the premise that God created the universe.
I guess my thought is, it’s been a long time since people started walking the earth, what has God been up to in all that time? I know it’s erroneous to “humanize” Him, but if he has the ability to watch over all of mankind, who’s to say that uses even a fraction of his capacity. He had his reasons for Earth, maybe he had reasons for other planets and civilizations too and He just didn’t tell us because it’s none of our dang business.

I guess I’m not really looking for answers from you, more of a general idea of if that kind of stuff is ever discussed.
You catch on quick. And in terms of theological new heavens/new earth/new incorruptible bodies are pretty much the promise of Christ.

God almighty is unknowable but it always amuses me when humans try to bring a court level case against him for human suffering and other ills. As you said, God doesn't really have to provide an explanation. It'd be like me questioning "hey why do you cut grass on tuesdays instead of wednesday? Because it's your house, your rules, and you conduct yourself and your affairs how you see fit and no one outside your house is owed any explanation. It's your world there, and everything in it, is yours and you do exactly as you please. It's like a reflection of the heavenly realm.

If you read Exodus 33:20 you will notice it says "no one can see the face of God and live" yet just a few verses earlier in Exodus 33:11 we are told that Moses spoke to the Lord face to face as one man speaks to another". An apparent contradiction. But it's not because it was Christ who gave Moses the law on Sinai. It is by Christ only you can know God almighty.

The reasons for man's existence is to serve and glorify God. To tend his garden. "The earth and all that is in it are the Lords". So he owns it all, even your time and talents belong to him.
 
Back
Top