G
Geo
Well-known member
Is that a rhetorical question, or do you really want a list?Not semantics. They’re the same or marginally better or worse, so who’s “taking over” exactly?
Is that a rhetorical question, or do you really want a list?Not semantics. They’re the same or marginally better or worse, so who’s “taking over” exactly?
Yes, tell me who exactly you think is “taking over” should Harris win instead of Trump.Is that a rhetorical question, or do you really want a list?
You can start with all people involved in the "russia collusion hoax" the same people that stole the last presidential election. You can find most of them running the country right now. Jake sullivan, Antony Blinken, Lisa Manaco, Barry Soetero, Susan Rice, Kathlyn Rummler, Eric Holder.Yes, tell me who exactly you think is “taking over” should Harris win instead of Trump.
No it’s not. It’s the direct result of bad business decisions.
Trump could have “Drained the swamp” (Like he promised to) last time, and instead he hired them. But anyways, those people aren’t communists.You can start with all people involved in the "russia collusion hoax" the same people that stole the last presidential election. You can find most of them running the country right now. Jake sullivan, Antony Blinken, Lisa Manaco, Barry Soetero, Susan Rice, Kathlyn Rummler, Eric Holder.
Ivan Raiklin has the list. It's about 500 people I think.
He could have but chose to try to work with them, big mistake. I don't think he would make that mistake again.Trump could have “Drained the swamp” (Like he promised to) last time, and instead he hired them. But anyways, those people aren’t communists.
Change my mind. What do you think makes them communists?And, yes they are. You just have not come to that realization yet.
The short answer is, they don't care for what or who the people want, they are going to control the country by any means necessary.Change my mind. What do you think makes them communists?
That ain’t communism.The short answer is, they don't care for what or who the people want, they are going to control the country by any means necessary.
It's more the means to communism, the laws and rules will follow. And they have already begun.That ain’t communism.
I feel like most of them would rather see the country destroyed than have someone come into power and do the right thing.The short answer is, they don't care for what or who the people want, they are going to control the country by any means necessary.
Maybe because they know the corruption they perpetuated.I feel like most of them would rather see the country destroyed than have someone come into power and do the right thing.
The idea of a Representative Republic is to elect people into position to do what the people want. Not to be evil or not, not to do what they think is necessary or not and certainly not to maintain their power through corruption. They are tools of the people, they are not "leaders" in anyway.I maintain that none of these people are ideological. They don’t have evil plans other than do whatever it takes to gain power and money, which is evil, but not ideological. This is true of any state system. Communism was sold to a population that wanted it, just the same as democracy and so on.
These corrupt people get away with what they do by taking over education and brainwashing the masses. They disguise their tyranny by calling it patriotic and "saving democracy" and they have built quite a large following in this country. They tell their followers that we will be a better country if we do a and b. they pretend to be nationalists.Communism requires a very strong sense of nationalism to function.
No cease to the meddling and damage the US has done down in central and south America apparently.
That's great but it's a fantasy, just like the idea that communism will provide for everyone and no one will need anything.The idea of a Representative Republic is to elect people into position to do what the people want. Not to be evil or not, not to do what they think is necessary or not and certainly not to maintain their power through corruption. They are tools of the people, they are not "leaders" in anyway.
That's not the point, and I'm not saying I would rather live in a "Communist" state than here. I'm taking issue with your continued use of the word "communism" when whatever system we have here is not communism, and is still looking like it could get as bad here as it did in the Soviet Union.I am sure if you spoke to anyone who fled a communist country to come to America, they would tell you this is what communism looks like.