Democrats Are Communist

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geo
  • Start date Start date
Yes, tell me who exactly you think is “taking over” should Harris win instead of Trump.
You can start with all people involved in the "russia collusion hoax" the same people that stole the last presidential election. You can find most of them running the country right now. Jake sullivan, Antony Blinken, Lisa Manaco, Barry Soetero, Susan Rice, Kathlyn Rummler, Eric Holder.

Ivan Raiklin has the list. It's about 500 people I think.
 
This is a direct result of communism.

154bc5e4fe92058b.jpg
 
You can start with all people involved in the "russia collusion hoax" the same people that stole the last presidential election. You can find most of them running the country right now. Jake sullivan, Antony Blinken, Lisa Manaco, Barry Soetero, Susan Rice, Kathlyn Rummler, Eric Holder.

Ivan Raiklin has the list. It's about 500 people I think.
Trump could have “Drained the swamp” (Like he promised to) last time, and instead he hired them. But anyways, those people aren’t communists.
 
Trump could have “Drained the swamp” (Like he promised to) last time, and instead he hired them. But anyways, those people aren’t communists.
He could have but chose to try to work with them, big mistake. I don't think he would make that mistake again.

And, yes they are. You just have not come to that realization yet.
 
The short answer is, they don't care for what or who the people want, they are going to control the country by any means necessary.
I feel like most of them would rather see the country destroyed than have someone come into power and do the right thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo
I maintain that none of these people are ideological. They don’t have evil plans other than do whatever it takes to gain power and money, which is evil, but not ideological. This is true of any state system. Communism was sold to a population that wanted it, just the same as democracy and so on.
 
Communism requires a very strong sense of nationalism to function. These globalist fucks have none of that, it's one of the primary reasons why they are so evil and caustic to orderly societies.
Communists were at least trying to build something greater than themselves, even if it was completely fucked up in the way they went about it. WEF, NWO fucks do not care about anything besides money and power. Think about how regressive and stupid leaders are today. [Think about fucking Justin Trudeau, a literal fucking retard] These are not 'smart' people, yeah they have navigated ways into positions of power which requires a lot of intelligence and nepotism, but that is really the extent of their intelligence/advantages. They know nothing of what to do after that point. NWO probably came from some really, really smart people back in the day, but all those people who spearheaded that project and set things in motion are gone, and their replacements have become dumber, and dumber, less creative, more base in their desires, just dull, stupid, greedy people.
These people aren't communist, they have little if any political theories or desires, they only use it as a way to make money.
Labels are kinda stupid tbh, I understand they make things easier to talk about but at a point they just do more harm then good and calling this globalist movement communism is hiding parts of their method which grants them power and that is definitely international capitalism.
 
I maintain that none of these people are ideological. They don’t have evil plans other than do whatever it takes to gain power and money, which is evil, but not ideological. This is true of any state system. Communism was sold to a population that wanted it, just the same as democracy and so on.
The idea of a Representative Republic is to elect people into position to do what the people want. Not to be evil or not, not to do what they think is necessary or not and certainly not to maintain their power through corruption. They are tools of the people, they are not "leaders" in anyway.

I am sure if you spoke to anyone who fled a communist country to come to America, they would tell you this is what communism looks like.
 
Communism requires a very strong sense of nationalism to function.
These corrupt people get away with what they do by taking over education and brainwashing the masses. They disguise their tyranny by calling it patriotic and "saving democracy" and they have built quite a large following in this country. They tell their followers that we will be a better country if we do a and b. they pretend to be nationalists.
 
The idea of a Representative Republic is to elect people into position to do what the people want. Not to be evil or not, not to do what they think is necessary or not and certainly not to maintain their power through corruption. They are tools of the people, they are not "leaders" in anyway.
That's great but it's a fantasy, just like the idea that communism will provide for everyone and no one will need anything.
I am sure if you spoke to anyone who fled a communist country to come to America, they would tell you this is what communism looks like.
That's not the point, and I'm not saying I would rather live in a "Communist" state than here. I'm taking issue with your continued use of the word "communism" when whatever system we have here is not communism, and is still looking like it could get as bad here as it did in the Soviet Union.
 
Back
Top