Rock Standard Review

  • Thread starter Thread starter VHTStark
  • Start date Start date
VHTStark

VHTStark

Well-known member
Ordered this a few months ago after a helpful discussion with @WizardSouth-JP

I have had enough time behind it now, that I can give a review. Even though I feel the MC's, MTL's and Hellrazor's will always be the popular Wizard order and most discussed, hopefully this sheds some light on this less popular....but equally amazing, Wizard!

OVERVIEW: According to Rick, the Rock Standard is in the same "family" of amps as his Vintage Classic and W800 models. It is a single channel design, with 2 inputs. It has the same control layout as the MTL model, minus saturation control. On mine, a 2024 RS 100 model, the 3-way mini togel is replaced by a push/pull tone stack mod on the treble pot and a Foot-Switchable bright control, which also increases the gain.

PLAYING EXPERIENCE: the MTL control layout makes this amp an incredibly versatile beast with an overall Vintage delivery. This thing can get suuuuuper bright and kerrang-y; I keep both the sweep and bright in the 3-4 range on this amp. On my MC1, I typically have the bright up around 1 O'clock or so.

Like any Wizard, it has a tight and immediate response, with next level clarity and punch. Like the W800, the RS has a bit more bounce/chew/give under the fingers compared to my MC1 or the MC2 and MTL I tried. That said, all of those amps have more overall gain on tap. They also have a decidedly more aggressive tonal signature overall. With the depth up, boost/bright on (or a boost) and some tone stack tweaking, you can absolutely make the RS get nasty, but it never gets in to what I would call "modern high gain". It really excels at vintage voiced medium to high gain rock and metal tones and you can really fine tune it to any cabinet or room.

Super happy with it! There is some overlap between this and the W800, but they are still different enough I am keeping both. My MC1 100w with "C" transformers is a different beast altogether.
 

Attachments

  • 20241014_100305.jpg
    20241014_100305.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 113
Excellent rundown, spot on - the Rock Standard has more chew than the 800 which I prefer. I would argue that with the right boost/OD you can take the RS into metal territory - maybe not super modern, but the lower gain yields more clarity and chewier attack without being too rounded in the lows. Congrats on your new Wizard.
 
Picked up a 50w EL34 Rock Standard to revisit this beast again...

Awesome man! I am still loving mine; a more vintage voiced/feeling Wizard with a lot of ways to sculpt your tone.

I actually set mine up very similar to how you have yours. The RS can get absurdly bright and mid-forward if you want it to.
 
Awesome man! I am still loving mine; a more vintage voiced/feeling Wizard with a lot of ways to sculpt your tone.

I actually set mine up very similar to how you have yours. The RS can get absurdly bright and mid-forward if you want it to.
yeah the bright options can get cutting, but then i guess changing the sweep and presence are there to get tones a different way. simple amp with lots of control options - no option paralysis on this amp - but still many ways to go about getting your tone.
 
yeah the bright options can get cutting, but then i guess changing the sweep and presence are there to get tones a different way. simple amp with lots of control options - no option paralysis on this amp - but still many ways to go about getting your tone.
Agreed man! I feel like the RS is an amp a ton of guys would really love if they tried it.

That said, most players, if they are ponying up money for a Wizard (in most cases a first/only Wizard) they are going to get an MC/MTL/Hellrazor.

And I get that. But I do love mine and it is certainly different enough from my MC1 and MCII to warrant having!
 
Agreed man! I feel like the RS is an amp a ton of guys would really love if they tried it.

That said, most players, if they are ponying up money for a Wizard (in most cases a first/only Wizard) they are going to get an MC/MTL/Hellrazor.

And I get that. But I do love mine and it is certainly different enough from my MC1 and MCII to warrant having!
I’m more into simple layouts and the less is more credo. 1 channel with good dynamics can do clean to mean with just the guitar volume knob and a couple good boost pedals.
 
I’m more into simple layouts and the less is more credo. 1 channel with good dynamics can do clean to mean with just the guitar volume knob and a couple good boost pedals.
Great clip and the RS sounds great. I have the MCll and had the W800 but felt I could get about the same tone on the Rhythm channel on the MC.

Are the W800 and RS about the same gainwise and upper mids?
 
Great clip and the RS sounds great. I have the MCll and had the W800 but felt I could get about the same tone on the Rhythm channel on the MC.

Are the W800 and RS about the same gainwise and upper mids?
The RS has more gain and way more EQ controls to shape the tones, so yes.
 
Great clip and the RS sounds great. I have the MCll and had the W800 but felt I could get about the same tone on the Rhythm channel on the MC.

Are the W800 and RS about the same gainwise and upper mids?
I still have a w800 and was surprised how close I can get to it in feel and tone with my MCII on the rythm channel with the blackat and boost engaged.

My RS is a bit different than my w800. It is both more vintage in voicing and has a bit more gain on tap. With the voicing options, it can also be a much "bigger" sounding amp than the w800.
 

I still have a w800 and was surprised how close I can get to it in feel and tone with my MCII on the rythm channel with the blackat and boost engaged.

My RS is a bit different than my w800. It is both more vintage in voicing and has a bit more gain on tap. With the voicing options, it can also be a much "bigger" sounding amp than the w800.
Thanks. Sounds like a cool amp. And with a boost it can get pretty heavy👍
 
Last edited:
Back
Top