I
itsme
Well-known member
Agree. I can get any sound I want outta the basic Seymour Duncan lineup
What do pickups do again? Why do we call them "Pickups"? They convert energy transferred through a system (the instrument) into an electrical signal. The resonance of the instrument do contribute to the output signal by amplifying of nullifying certain frequencies depending on the wood.Acoustic instruments and acoustic resonance. Not electrical/magnetic.
What’s the equation to covert wood grain to Gauss again?
His website is still up, I emailed him but have not heard anything back... He made some nice stuff.. Loved his amps and pickups..He moved to Japan and isn't currently producing pickups. My guess is he's trying to dry up the market and once they start going for $850 on the used market, he comes back with $1k sets spun from silver plated Geisha hair. I mean, that's what I would do.![]()
The first PAFs were trying to capture the tone of the P90 pickup that Gibson was already using.Weren’t the first PAFs super bright as to compete with the telecaster ?
Is this a serious question? Take ash and alder for an example. If you have two guitars that have identical specs apart from the body wood, I can definitely hear the between an ash, alder or mahogany body. Pickups are a microphone for the guitar. You can shape the input gain and the EQ spectrum, but the tone of the guitar starts in the wood it is made from.How does wood transcend to an electrical signal?
His website is still up, I emailed him but have not heard anything back... He made some nice stuff.. Loved his amps and pickups..
So break it down. What’s the correlation of tone wood and magnetic resonance and induction?View attachment 400907View attachment 400908
And this is the crazy part. You can record yourself playing a guitar, right? It's what's called "clips" in common parlance. And then you can analyze the frequencies of the clip with these crazy tools called "frequency analyzers" that come free with every DAW known to man.
View attachment 400909
And believe it or not, people who have spent a lot of time doing recording can quickly parse these numbers just like someone would quickly do basic addition or subtraction in their head. I know, I know, it's crazy. But these are, in fact, numbers, just like you asked for.
There are limitations, certainly, especially the way frequencies change over time.
But when you are listening to a sound, you are literally collating and analyzing these numbers in realtime in your head, though they can certainly be represented as a static data set if you're autistic enough to require that.
I don't get along with them either. I like a bunch of other duncans, but the mid range spike of the JB just feels a bit unnatural to me - at least with my playing.
I get why other people like it. It just isn't for me at all
I'm certainly more the specific type, but I try not to shit on everyone else's ice cream - particularly when the ice cream is obviously good, just not my flavor
Put it in an equation.Is this a serious question? Take ash and alder for an example. If you have two guitars that have identical specs apart from the body wood, I can definitely hear the between an ash, alder or mahogany body. Pickups are a microphone for the guitar. You can shape the input gain and the EQ spectrum, but the tone of the guitar starts in the wood it is made from.
Also a strawman.Outside of dealing with mass, why are skyscrapers and bridges made from specific shapes and material density?
We're literally back to the beginning of the point I was making.So break it down. What’s the correlate to tone wood and magnetic resonance???
IlluminatiOutside of dealing with mass, why are skyscrapers and bridges made from specific shapes and material density?
Also a strawman.
Illuminati
Aww, come on! We need more experts in here. I'll do it.He may have just paid in advance for website hosting. He still frequents this forum if you want to contact him his handle is Scottosan. I'm not going to tag him, because he would probably pull his hair out reading a lot of the comments in this thread.![]()
You didn’t answer anything bro.We're literally back to the beginning of the point I was making.
Which, by the way, I don't care enough about it to have a tonewood debate - I was just saying the answer to the question you posed about it is obvious.
What is the magnet "picking up"? The strings.
And now you’re on to ad hominem… attack the speaker not the argument. What you did is throw up a distraction… look over here at the pretty building. Argue for it!That's a better answer than "straw man," because if Professor Jerk Off knew what he was talking about he would see the relevance.
I used to hang out with Rick Thagorean, decendent of Pythagorean. That's the only reason I know this.That's a better answer than "straw man," because if Professor Jerk Off knew what he was talking about he would see the relevance.
What you did is throw up a distraction… look over here at the pretty building. Argue for it!
You didn’t answer anything bro.
You didn’t correlate anything. If X happens Y happens… then you gave me a chart of individual string tuning frequencies. Come on man you’re smarter than this…
How does the wood grain density transcend into an electrical signal???
Go!
The logic already got explained to you in previous posts. If you don't buy it? That's totally fine.
i'm actually not really a hardcore tonewood believer or disbeliever, your argument is just a "I can't see the forest for the trees so that means it doesn't exist" and it's physically making my IQ lower