ICE Attorney resigns in protest

  • Thread starter Thread starter JDs Couch
  • Start date Start date
RGX_Custom said:
Well it's true...you do selectively choose your news. You sound like it in a lot of your posts. You have quite a hatred towards Democrats that it blinds your judgement sometimes. :yes:
Click to expand...
Here's an experiment. Find a single left winger here who has posted a link to a single article about Trump that isn't negative. While you're at it explain why even unbiased sources report that the news coverage of Trump has been lopsided beyond rational. You can Google it you don't have to take my word for it. Then ask yourself why trust in the media is at an all time low. If you're being honest and you think the media isn't on the democrat bandwagon and has been for years and has been very open about it in the attempt to take down Trump you have some sort of mental disability.

Since I am not one of the afflicted and don't choose to spend all my time talking about what a dipshit Trump is, I don't generally look for links that prove it. There's enough of those here. Also in almost every instance the links I post refute something someone else said or a link they posted. It's not as if I go looking for shit that fits my narrative and then post it here.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Here's an experiment. Find a single left winger here who has posted a link to a single article about Trump that isn't negative. While you're at it explain why even unbiased sources report that the news coverage of Trump has been lopsided beyond rational. You can Google it you don't have to take my word for it. Then ask yourself why trust in the media is at an all time low. If you're being honest and you think the media isn't on the democrat bandwagon and has been for years and has been very open about it in the attempt to take down Trump you have some sort of mental disability.

Since I am not one of the afflicted and don't choose to spend all my time talking about what a dipshit Trump is, I don't generally look for links that prove it. There's enough of those here. Also in almost every instance the links I post refute something someone else said or a link they posted. It's not as if I go looking for shit that fits my narrative and then post it here.
Click to expand...

Of course they're are left-wingers who will talk about Trump badly, especially if he does something bad, but there are right-wingers who will praise Trump because it's part of the cult mentality. Trump is a convicted felon (34 counts) and a series of other things that he's done illegally yet you seem to make it normal...like it's expected. I don't think it's a Trump takedown like you portray it...it's more about justice.
 
RGX_Custom said:
Of course they're are left-wingers who will talk about Trump badly, especially if he does something bad, but there are right-wingers who will praise Trump because it's part of the cult mentality. Trump is a convicted felon (34 counts) and a series of other things that he's done illegally yet you seem to make it normal...like it's expected. I don't think it's a Trump takedown like you portray it...it's more about justice.
Click to expand...
I’m not a Trump fan. But looking at the facts of the case Alvin Bragg brought against Trump, if you think 34 felony convictions is justice and not lawfare you’re dumb as fuck.
 
Floyd Eye said:
I’m not a Trump fan. But looking at the facts of the case Alvin Bragg brought against Trump, if you think 34 felony convictions is justice and not lawfare you’re dumb as fuck.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that facts of the case are not actual facts but lawfare? Can you expound on this theory?
 
RGX_Custom said:
So you are saying that facts of the case are not actual facts but lawfare? Can you expound on this theory?
Click to expand...
I’m saying that no one in the history of NY has ever been charged under that statute. And that it was a misdemeanor until they decided to charge Trump under it. And the guy who made all that happen literally campaigned on “ Getting Trump “. Don’t play stupid dude. I know it’s hard to not be biased about it but you should try. It will give your legitimate arguments against Trump ( which are many) some credibility.
 
Floyd Eye said:
I’m saying that no one in the history of NY has ever been charged under that statute.
Click to expand...

Well there's a first time for everything and Trump did not disappoint. It's plain to see that Trump is a con man and the law just finally caught up to him...until he became President again. I guess that's why they call him Teflon Don.
 
RGX_Custom said:
Of course they're are left-wingers who will talk about Trump badly, especially if he does something bad, but there are right-wingers who will praise Trump because it's part of the cult mentality. Trump is a convicted felon (34 counts) and a series of other things that he's done illegally yet you seem to make it normal...like it's expected. I don't think it's a Trump takedown like you portray it...it's more about justice.
Click to expand...
Just because someone thinks differently than you, does not mean they are in a cult.
When you use language like this, you lose all credibility.
 
JDs Couch said:
NEW GALLUP POLL: the pendulum has swung **drastically** on immigration since last year.

🟢 just 30% want immigration decreased (55% last year)

🟢 79% of Americans think immigration is GOOD for the country (record high)

🟢 Path to citizenship (78%) beats mass deportation (38%)
Click to expand...
Believe what you want, we’ll see who wins the next election. Care to prophesy for us again?
 
Robostyle said:
Just because someone thinks differently than you, does not mean they are in a cult.
When you use language like this, you lose all credibility.
Click to expand...

I didn't say everyone was in a cult...but a good majority are without even knowing it. I think you should know better than that. ;)
 
RGX_Custom said:
I didn't say everyone was in a cult...but a good majority are without even knowing it. I think you should know better than that. ;)
Click to expand...
What is "a good majority" according to you?
And you know this how?
Hint- you don't. You're talking out of your ass.
 
Robostyle said:
What is "a good majority" according to you?
And you know this how?
Hint- you don't. You're talking out of your ass.
Click to expand...

Well I know you are one of them that are in the cult of Trump. You pretty much defend the guy and talk like you are giving him a rim job. :yes:
 
RGX_Custom said:
Well I know you are one of them that are in the cult of Trump. You pretty much defend the guy and talk like you are giving him a rim job. :yes:
Click to expand...
We've been through this, leaf.
When everyone who disagrees with you is "in a cult", you lose all credibility.
And giving dudes rim jobs sounds like your department. I don't go for that stuff, sorry.
 
Robostyle said:
We've been through this, leaf.
When everyone who disagrees with you is "in a cult", you lose all credibility.
And giving dudes rim jobs sounds like your department. I don't go for that stuff, sorry.
Click to expand...

I don't know how I lose credibility for making an observation. And who are you? Just some dude or dudette behind the keyboard who just joined a music forum. Like I need your approval for credibility. :LOL:
 
RGX_Custom said:
I don't know how I lose credibility for making an observation. And who are you? Just some dude or dudette behind the keyboard who just joined a music forum. Like I need your approval for credibility. :LOL:
Click to expand...
I suppose it depends what it is you're trying to do. If you are trying to influence people credibility is good. If you're just rippin' on the other side it really doesn't matter.
 
Laputan Machine said:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


>the people

What do you think this phrase means you fucking mongoloid?
4th amendment doesn't apply to non-citizens.
Click to expand...
They don't know if someone is a non citizen or not. They've been detaining plenty of citizens. Take care.
Love,
JD's Couch
 
Laputan Machine said:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


>the people

What do you think this phrase means you fucking mongoloid?
4th amendment doesn't apply to non-citizens.
Click to expand...
Hey dumb fuck:

"Yes, the Fourth Amendment does apply to non-citizens, both within the United States and at its borders, though the extent of its protection can vary. The Supreme Court has affirmed that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to all individuals within U.S. territory, regardless of their citizenship or immigration status. "
 
JDs Couch said:
Hey dumb fuck:

"Yes, the Fourth Amendment does apply to non-citizens, both within the United States and at its borders, though the extent of its protection can vary. The Supreme Court has affirmed that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to all individuals within U.S. territory, regardless of their citizenship or immigration status. "
Click to expand...
In United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the search and seizure by United States agents of property that is owned by a nonresident alien and located in a foreign country.

In reaching its decision, the majority examined the FourthAmendment phrase “the people.” It concluded that the term referred to“a class of persons who are part of a national community or have otherwisedeveloped sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of thatcommunity.” In contrast, those who have not established a sufficientconnection to this country are not one of “the people,” and,therefore, not protected under the Fourth Amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top