stephen sawall
SEMI ERECT MEMBER
I have read a little about wiring it both ways .... what do you know about it ?
Dallas Marlow":1dsbx9mq said:Haha, first we need to establish where your going from because there is a terminology confusion, I personally like the speakers in series and paralleled at the jack, it sounds a LOT LOT better to my ears and is how the original marshall cabs were wired!
You are quite wrong, sorry.Dallas Marlow":3qnkfcn7 said:Haha, first we need to establish where your going from because there is a terminology confusion, I personally like the speakers in series and paralleled at the jack, it sounds a LOT LOT better to my ears and is how the original marshall cabs were wired!
Scumback Speakers":vdcn1e1u said:You are quite wrong, sorry.Dallas Marlow":vdcn1e1u said:Haha, first we need to establish where your going from because there is a terminology confusion, I personally like the speakers in series and paralleled at the jack, it sounds a LOT LOT better to my ears and is how the original marshall cabs were wired!
Marshall wired them both ways, parallel at the jack, in series at the speakers, and in parallel at the speakers, series to the jack. I've seen original examples of both from the 60's, with the parallel at the jack being the most common (meaning there are two wires to both the negative and positive of the jack).
And depending on the speakers used, and what tones and frequency ranges you like, one scheme can be better than the other.
There's a lengthy thread on this at the Metro Amp forum, just type in "series-parallel" and you'll start a 40 page thread marathon read. Good luck.
Yeah, a big difference. I rewired it with 16 gauge wire. That cheap crap Marshall had in there had to be 20 or maybe even 22...for God's sake.
Once I rewired it series/parallel the speakers sounded like they should. They broke up too fast for me, but that's how M's are. When I ran the Komet clone on about 6-7 it was fine, but past that they mushed out, so that's the threshold of four G12M's even with 6402 cones.
But, yeah, Rockstah is right, more organic, better high end (not so thin and brittle), bass was more defined, and overall more organic and rich sounding, with way more harmonics.
psychodave":31vg3883 said:I use series/parallel. Anything else sound like shit to me...![]()
![]()
![]()
Sixtonoize":p30cqljd said:Very interesting topic.
Has anyone that you know of made clips of the difference?
I'd like to hear it for myself before I have to get all un-lazy and force myself to DIY.
stephen sawall":1efebmgz said:I have two 4x12's and decided to do one of each.
stephen sawall":2uju6316 said:I have two 4x12's and decided to do one of each.
stephen sawall":3bv4lun9 said:I need to get a new battery for my power screw driver ..... so this may not happen real soon. The car and a few other things well be fixed first. I have no intentions of doing three cabinets without a power screw driver. I well post when it is done.
I am switching around speakers in both 4x12's and my 2x12. I am adding Mitchell Donuts to all three cabs. The cabs are different. One is a Marshall slant about 20 years old. The other is a Peavey strait about 25 years old. The Peavey sounds a lot like the old Marshall cabs .... but I like it's sound better than any Marshall I have heard. At this point I think both cabinets well have the same speakers in them.
This link may be interesting to you .... Hunters clips are here ...
http://www.hugeracksinc.com/forum/viewt ... p?p=657215
TheMagicEight":271mmnou said:Awesome thread! Will definitely be changing my Bogner to Series-Parallel once I order more Scumbacks!