Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Thanks manI can't say I've ever heard Dan directly crap on christianity.
Thanks manI can't say I've ever heard Dan directly crap on christianity.
I didn't say it disproves it. Just like you can't "Prove" it. I said I don't believe it because their evidence is goofy and they are known liars. I had understood the radiation belt was the excuse why we hadn't returned. Maybe you missed that one. If it turns out that's not a limiting factor why haven't we gone back since? Seems like everyone is pretty hyped about, yourself included. Up for you to decide if you want to believe the adult Santa stories.none of that disproves anything. I get that you don’t trust the government, and that is your own cross to bare, but your distrust for the government doesn’t mean a fucking thing to be honest. It’s just your crutch.
The radiation belt argument is stupid. Especially because radiation is something that is taken very seriously and is a big limiting factor to human exploration. It was calculated to be safe before the mission(s) and it was. You guys chose to laugh at it, but the gene therapy I was talking about in another thread is in part focusing on making humans less susceptible to radiation so that they can spend more time in space.
You thinking that we haven’t returned to the moon is again your own shortcoming. It’s not easy to get there so obviously we need a reason to. After the Apollo missions (yes more than one group of men made it there) there wasn’t any scientific relevance to go back
Now there is. The Artemis missions have a plan and now we are interested in going back.
Every argument against it is just absolute garbage
He's been sent a strong delusion.I didn't say it disproves it. Just like you can't "Prove" it. I said I don't believe it because their evidence is goofy and they are known liars. I had understood the radiation belt was the excuse why we hadn't returned. Maybe you missed that one. If it turns out that's not a limiting factor why haven't we gone back since? Seems like everyone is pretty hyped about, yourself included. Up for you to decide if you want to believe the adult Santa stories.
You're trying to reason with multiple generations of people now who were raised on star wars, star trek, buck rogers, and so many sci fi movies from their formative years. These tools of propaganda have cemented the idea of space travel as a possibility in their minds.I didn't say it disproves it. Just like you can't "Prove" it. I said I don't believe it because their evidence is goofy and they are known liars. I had understood the radiation belt was the excuse why we hadn't returned. Maybe you missed that one. If it turns out that's not a limiting factor why haven't we gone back since? Seems like everyone is pretty hyped about, yourself included. Up for you to decide if you want to believe the adult Santa stories.
I had all that same stuff though. I think at some point I just started realizing they lie left and right and started questioning all the stories. I guess a distinguishing factor is that I don’t get any benefits, EG professional, personal, status, etc. from believing their stupid crap. And it’s not just “Virtue signaling” to tout the party line. It’s the ticket to the lunch table with the “Cool” kids. Except they’re not cool. They’re ghey and evil.You're trying to reason with multiple generations of people now who were raised on star wars, star trek, buck rogers, and so many sci fi movies from their formative years. These tools of propaganda have cemented the idea of space travel as a possibility in their minds.
I had all that stuff too. Give thanks, God blessed you with good insights and a mind capable of critical thinking.I had all that same stuff though. I think at some point I just started realizing they lie left and right and started questioning all the stories. I guess a distinguishing factor is that I don’t get any benefits, EG professional, personal, status, etc. from believing their stupid crap. And it’s not just “Virtue signaling” to tout the party line. It’s the ticket to the lunch table with the “Cool” kids. Except they’re not cool. They’re ghey and evil.
I didn't say it disproves it. Just like you can't "Prove" it. I said I don't believe it because their evidence is goofy and they are known liars. I had understood the radiation belt was the excuse why we hadn't returned. Maybe you missed that one. If it turns out that's not a limiting factor why haven't we gone back since? Seems like everyone is pretty hyped about, yourself included. Up for you to decide if you want to believe the adult Santa stories.
They, NASA, always use the excuse that we lost the technology. I've never heard a more asinine, lame dick excuse for anything in my entire life.I told you why I don’t think we’ve been back, and I told you why we are now thinking about it again. Reread my post please.
The radiation belt argument is lame. This sums it up nicely
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/smiii_problem7.pdf
It is however a limiting factor, at the moment, to how long a person could stay on the moon (or other planet). Radiation in space is no joke, the van Allen belt keeping us out of space is a joke
Completely incorrectThey, NASA, always use the excuse that we lost the technology. I've never heard a more asinine, lame dick excuse for anything in my entire life.
Who's using that excuse then? It sure seems to get thrown around as a reason we haven't gone back.Completely incorrect
Who's using that excuse then? It sure seems to get thrown around as a reason we haven't gone back.
Seeing as how we haven't been back it can really be debunked until then though.Trolls on Twitter use it.
So what changed that now it is (Again) considered “Scientifically relevant” in your view?Completely incorrect
just because someone makes up something doesn’t mean someone else has to debunk itSeeing as how we haven't been back it can really be debunked until then though.
I’ve already told you. You literally responded to the post.So what changed that now it is (Again) considered “Scientifically relevant” in your view?
What specifically, other than the goal of the first woman and “Person of color?” ?I’ve already told you. You literally responded to the post.
Artemis project
Except why Aynirar can't post a clip.I've never heard a more asinine, lame dick excuse for anything in my entire life.
The criticisms of the moon landing have existed since it supposedly took place. There is too much evidence to the contrary that suggests it was just a psyop on a sound stage somewhere or other deceitful act.just because someone makes up something doesn’t mean someone else has to debunk it