Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
What specifically, other than the goal of the first woman and “Person of color?” ?
That’s seriously what you got from it?
What specifically, other than the goal of the first woman and “Person of color?” ?
There is zero evidence against itThe criticisms of the moon landing have existed since it supposedly took place. There is too much evidence to the contrary that suggests it was just a psyop on a sound stage somewhere or other deceitful act.
I’ve posts like a dozen videos of myself playingExcept why Aynirar can't post a clip.
![]()
Staying warm in the Berkshires with blanket statements.There is zero evidence against it
I will second that. You've posted clips. You just haven't gone to the moon.I’ve posts like a dozen videos of myself playing
Again, what makes it so worthwhile now but not the past 50 years? This is all generic crap:That’s seriously what you got from it?
Both trueI will second that. You've posted clips. You just haven't gone to the moon.
They are going to build a station on the moon so that we can take off from there to get other places, namely people on marsAgain, what makes it worthwhile now but not the past 50 years. This is all genetic crap:
View attachment 278435
Artemis. Apollo. Saturn. Columbia.Again, what makes it worthwhile now but not the past 50 years. This is all genetic crap:
View attachment 278435
That’s not true. You just dismiss the evidence against it.There is zero evidence against it
It's like 2024, bro..I’ve posts like a dozen videos of myself playing
Why now, in 2024, versus 2014, 2004, 1994 etc.?They are going to build a station on the moon so that we can take off from there to get other places, namely people on mars
You don’t think that’s a clear direction?
I refuse to believe it. Nobody walked around on anything but a stage using wires to simulate weightlessness. If it was 1/10th the weigh or whatever the dust they landing module would kick up would make a mess that would take a long time to settle. I know cause I live in the dirt and when I did donuts on my blaster it took a long time for the dirt to settle back down. That whole thing is as fake as the day is long.But other people have
Mostly the advances in 3D printing. They can’t just fly steel beams and construction material to the moon, they are going to print it thereWhy now, in 2024, versus 2014, 2004, 1994 etc.?
I decided your new nickname is "Popular Science". What do you think?Mostly the advances in 3D printing. They can’t just fly steel beams and construction material to the moon, they are going to print it there
The moon doesn’t have any air for dust to float in sweetie.I refuse to believe it. Nobody walked around on anything but a stage using wires to simulate weightlessness. If it was 1/10th the weigh or whatever the dust they landing module would kick up would make a mess that would take a long time to settle. I know cause I live in the dirt and when I did donuts on my blaster it took a long time for the dirt to settle back down. That whole thing is as fake as the day is long.
Yes a blasting jet engine wouldn't have kicked up any dust at all. A perfectly still landing. You could hear rats pissing on cotton as they eased her down onto the lunar surface..The moon doesn’t have any air for dust to float in sweetie.
A lot of them are not phone in the room. It’s a line out in to my phone, like this oneIt's like 2024, bro..
That whole cellphone-in-the-room-recorded-guitar bullcrap needs to end.
![]()
Yes a blasting jet engine wouldn't have kicked up any dust at all. A perfectly still landing. You could hear rats pissing on cotton as they eased her down onto the lunar surface..
I decided your new nickname is "Popular Science". What do you think?